210
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 65 points 1 year ago

Imagine telling people you love america so much, that you fully support the ideals of an autocratic suppressive foreign regime.... AND PEOPLE BUY IT. Republicans are bringing this country down by the help of useful idiots - on the stage and in the seats.

[-] macrocephalic@lemmy.fmhy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

They spent most of the 20th century telling us that Russia was the biggest threat to the world. 25 years later Russia starts invading its neighbouring countries and the halfwits are taking the Russian side.

[-] Robbeee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They said the Soviet Union was the biggest threat to the western world. Now they're supporting the ghouls who devoured its corpse.

[-] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imagine rooting and fully supporting the actual enemy of the values, way of life and political views of your own country. Because that's what Russia and Putin are. That means being a traitor even by the enemy standards

[-] i_had_name@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The dude is sucking some Russian cock.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

Dudes a Russian plant. What more evidence is needed. Get him the fuck out of here.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Why does a "Christian presidential forum" exist? People need to keep their death cult book clubs out of politics.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Because tolerant liberals kept tolerating religious garbage for decades instead of confronting this shit early on. Now here we are.

[-] taanegl@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Boot licking shill licks boot and shills. News at 11.

[-] Raphael@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Don't let the US become an all-out theocracy please, your stupidity affects all of us.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Was this after or before he had serious discussion with Andrew Tate about climate change?

[-] EeeDawg101@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Can someone share the article? It just loads an ad for me.

Archive.is link to article

Mentioning @Bridger@sh.itjust.works too in case you didn't want to scale the paywall earlier.

[-] EeeDawg101@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Awesome, thank you!

[-] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
210 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3581 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS