this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
164 points (94.1% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles (Moved to !electricvehicles@slrpnk.net)

3333 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

ArchiveA community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The best defense, it seems, is a cheap EV of our own.

No shit. Proving yet again that auto industry executives are complete morons waiting for another bailout.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ford didn't need or take a bailout.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They did ask for one from Congress, and when asked during testimony if they requested money from Mexico or China, the response was, "No, We're profitable in those countries."

But Ford mortgaged their brand instead and came out on top.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just read a whole article about the price of a car and don't know the price of the car. "Journalism"

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh boy, that makes me want it! Take all of my money!

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Need your credit score first

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And even a replying comment doesn't say the price.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah...sure it is. My brother ordered one 3 years ago and it was delivered last year - during which Ford hiked the price twice, removed features from the trim package, etc.

Each time he was given an opportunity to back out with a full refund of his deposit.

I'm pretty sure they were just trying to cut down the number of required deliveries while they figured out production problems - this discount is probably just returning to pre-hike pricing.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Quick google says $40k. Not expensive, but definitely not a "cheap" EV.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From what I can tell, it’s still in the ~$50,000 range.

I don’t really see how that can be considered ’cheap’.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, I don't know why everything is moving toward that ugly crossover form. They're ugly as sin IMO.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's the carcinization of automobiles. Tall station wagons are simply the most practical shape for cars to be.

Frankly, the thing that bothers me about the Mustang Mach E isn't the shape, but rather the fact that they desecrated the name of what's supposed to be a low-slung coupe.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Frankly, the thing that bothers me about the Mustang Mach E isn’t the shape, but rather the fact that they desecrated the name of what’s supposed to be a low-slung coupe.

The shape bothers me a lot, but this bothers me more. They could have just called it the Bronco. Or the Fairlane.

But if cars are all going to look like that in the future I guess I'm never buying a car again.

[–] slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I would hate this car much less than I do if they had called it anything BUT a Mustang.

[–] pedalmore@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's much more like a mustang than a bronco. Regardless, If Ford wants to call it a mustang, it's a mustang.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As much as I hate it, having a 50 year old blue collar welder with 2 Chevy trucks parked out front come over and get excited about "The new Mustang" made me realize how perfect that decision was. People can complain about it all they want, but I don't think it would have been anywhere close to being as successful otherwise.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Nobody lost money underestimating the American consumer

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think it's worse than them being ugly. I think the dimensions and visibility for crossovers makes people worse drivers. Massive blind spots, zero rear visibility, huge amounts of body roll in curves, and the danger of rollover are all worse in this body scheme.

It's so bad that they have to add technology like rear cameras, BLIS, and traction control to attempt to fix it because they can't just make a car with reasonable dimensions and good sight lines.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The MachE doesn’t really suffer from any of those issues. I had no major blind spots, in fact smaller than what I’ve been used to. Rear view mirrors were very effective, it’s a “Mustang like suspension” so it was super stable, to the point of uncomfortably stiff. With the battery pack underneath, the center of gravity makes a roll over extremely unlikely.

Your points are accurate for many other CUVs, especially ICE ones. But not the MachE. It has its own issues mind you. Specifically the suspension being so bumpy it induces car sickness. A, frankly, obscene amount of power which tempts bad driving habits. And the worst central control system I’ve ever experienced.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I'm glad the MachE doesn't have those issues, but you raise a good point about it having an obscene amount of power. A lot of EVs have way too much power for the average person.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You just listed a bunch of features that are standard on most vehicles these days.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the reason they're standard is because the cars aren't built correctly

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Rear cameras were mandated after a bunch of kids playing behind their parents car were run over, traction control exists because road conditions change throughout the year in most areas and blind spot monitors exist because all cars have blind spots and it reduces collisions. Saying all cars are built incorrectly with zero supporting argument isn't much of an argument. Cars are safer than they've ever been and much of the sight line issues are related to reinforced pillars to protect occupants in a crash.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The yellow is indeed bad. But it's still one of the better looking EVs...

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Dlayknee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He literally just told you

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think they told someone else…

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I much rather take my old car and pay to have the ICE engine taken out and replaced with a crate EV motor.

[–] kometes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is not the motor (as much) as it is where to put the batteries. Replacing just the gas tank on my tiny Subaru with a battery is not going to give the range I need.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ya, unfortunately that's the problem. But the majority of people don't need to drive over 100 miles a day and most kits these days are over 100 now.

[–] tracer_ca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

That take only works for families with multiple cars. A car would be pointless for me with a less than a 450km (280m) range.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would probably be way more expensive

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It looks like a Tonka toy

load more comments
view more: next ›