297
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Former Obama deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner engaged in a “level of corruption that we’ve just never seen” when talking about his firm’s recent investments overseas. 

Rhodes said that Kushner engaged in corruption when asked about The New York Times’s recent reporting that detailed that 99 percent of his investment fund’s money came from foreign sources. The outlet also reported Kushner is working on developing hotels in the Balkans, specifically in Serbia and Albania, and noted that the firm has taken money from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. 

“I mean, look, this is not subtle corruption that we’re looking at,” Rhodes told MSNBC’s Alex Wagner during his Wednesday appearance on “Alex Wagner Tonight.” 

“This is a guy, Jared Kushner, who had no expertise, no qualification whatsoever to be in the White House while he was there. He made it his account to work in the Gulf Arab states. He basically helped lead the cover-up for [Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud]. Get him in from the cold after the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.”

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 1800doctorb@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago

The guys at Pod Save America/The World seem to each have their own individual that gets under their skin more than most. Pieffer has/had Paul Ryan, Lovett has Rubio, and Rhodes has Kushner.

Whenever his name is brought up on those pods, it’s a 50/50 shot whether Rhodes or Vietor go on a 5 minute rant roasting Kushner and just how slimy he’s been.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago

You don’t need 5 minutes. “Former president’s unqualified family member appointed to oversee Middle East relations given $2B by Saudis just months after leaving appointment.” That sentence should be enough for an investigation.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 20 points 7 months ago

It should be enough for criminal charges.

[-] 1800doctorb@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Sure you don’t need 5 min, but you could use 5 to talk about all the shadiness and still not cover it all.

[-] swallowyourmind@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Hey, @disguy_ovahea

Noticed your very active account is only 5 days old, and wanted to take the opportunity to welcome you to Lemmy!

Thanks for joining!

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Thanks! I’m currently disabled, so I’ve been online a lot. Reddit isn’t what it used to be, (lots more polarizing toxicity) so I figured I’d finally take the leap to the fediverse.

[-] swallowyourmind@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Very much understand. And there are so many interesting folks and things to talk about here! Glad you're getting involved.

And very much agree on Reddit toxicity. Terrible. Though in time Lemmy may become the same.

You mention that you are currently disabled?

I find that a fascinating way to describe it, because I've only known ever known of non-disabled and disabled individuals (my apologies if there are more correct terms).

My understanding has always been disabilities are permanent, but always love learning how I have been wrong, so please share if you are comfortable.

Since you are "currently" so, I must assume it is temporary. If you don't mind me asking, what is your recovery time till no longer being that way?

Also, hope you have a positive support structure to help with any needs your disability may make more difficult.

Looking forward to your future contributions.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Aren’t you sweet. I don’t mind. I sustained a traumatic injury, right before the pandemic, that resulted in neuropathy. It was a slow start to recovery due to the lack of available doctors and treatment, but I think I’m on track now.

I’m way too dependent on getting out and meeting people every day to lie down and accept disability, so I’ve been working on balanced exercise, stretches, and some light yoga to get me in acceptable shape. Luckily, I was relatively fit prior to my injury, so I’m just focusing on getting the muscles to stabilize the nerve to minimize pain. Nerves may heal over time, so I can be optimistic about that as well.

Thanks for being so friendly and supportive.

[-] swallowyourmind@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Well, I appreciate you being willing to share.

And thank you for helping me to understand that not all disabilities are permanent.

It helps to hear about others troubles; we all get so wrapped up in our own we at times forget everyone else is dealing with their own.

COVID did such a number on needed non-COVID care. My own neighbor was forced to wait over two years for hip surgery to walk again, which they considered elective, which is absurd. I'm sorry that you, like all too many others, had to wait so long, and that the wait extended your recovery window.

I'm rooting for you to stick with your balancing, stretching, and yoga!

It is amazing how much can be regained through constant efforts. Physical therapy on my opinion is too often ignored by patients in their recovery, especially in less serious injuries than your own. Just keep at it! It gets better!

Thanks again for joining and contributing.

Hope your recovery is as full and as short as can be.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No wonder thr GOP is literally riding Hunters dick.

Edit:

I'll do if for you

Gaslight, Obstruct, Project

[-] cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz 22 points 7 months ago

Considering what the international standard for that is... holy shit

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev -1 points 7 months ago

At this point I don't care for opinion sound bites from either side. These would be only relevant if they're part of a judgement transcript.

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
297 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4047 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS