148

U.S. House Vote Narrowly Allows Rampant Abuses of Warrantless Spying Authority to Continue (US focused) (cdt.org)

submitted 6 months ago by thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/politics@lemmy.world

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/15271710

Not a good result. The good amendment to add a warrant requirement failed on a tie vote; bad amendments to expand the scope of warrantless wiretapping passed. Next step: a Senate vote.

top 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

If they expect me to take the Constitution seriously they'll need to do the same.

What a joke of a country.

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

"All men are created equal"

Is slave state

always has been.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.cafe 5 points 6 months ago

Brought to us by the same people saying we need to protect democracy

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

Republicans don't say that and they control the house

Get a clue or a brain.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.cafe -1 points 6 months ago

I'm talking about Democrats

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

And many of those votes in favor also claim we need to save Democracy

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Here’s your privacy friendly reminder that the government is currently incapable of decrypting end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) transmissions like iMessage, FaceTime, Signal, Viber, Telegram, WhatsApp, Protonmail, etc.

[+] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -9 points 6 months ago

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act establishes procedures for the surveillance and collection of foreign intelligence on domestic soil. If foreign agents are using communications signals to communicate with someone in the US, the government must go to the FISA court and obtain a warrant for surveillance. This is how we found out about Trump Jr. Contact with Russian agents. Catches a lot of spies. On the whole, better to have than not

[-] thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 6 months ago

The FBI routinely uses its authority under FISA Section 702 to get information on Americans without a warrant, ignoring the processes that are supposed to be put in place to protect people. This has nothing to do with the FISA Title III authority that was used to get information about Carter Page, no matter what you and Trump think. If you warrantless surveillance of Americans is good, then by all means you should indeed be cheering this vote -- because they extended the scope of what information they can get at without a warrant.

If on the other hand you think civil liberties are worth protecting, then you might take a moment to stop to think that there was bipartisan support, including progressive Democrats, for introducing reforms like a warrant requirement while still keeping the ability to surveil foreign agents in place. But opinions differ, there are plenty of people in both parties who don't think civil liberties are worth protecting, so if you're one of them you've got a lot of company.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

The FISA court provides warrants, it's what they do. If I was a legal compliance officer at a Telcom, I wouldn't move my ass for anything but a warrant. A tap without a warrant is illegal and puts the operating company in jeopardy.

[-] thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago

From the article:

FISA 702 warrantless surveillance purports to target only foreign subjects, but in practice sweeps in a huge amount of Americans’ communications. This allows intelligence agencies to exploit a backdoor search loophole: the FBI, CIA, and NSA conduct “U.S. person queries” of FISA 702 records to deliberately pull up Americans’ private messages, all without a warrant or any court approval. This loophole has led to systemic abuse, involving thousands of improper queries each year, including those directed at protesters, campaign donors, journalists, lawmakers, and — in one case — the online dating matches of an analyst.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

OK. There are no laws against the NSA picking up.foreign communications. In fact, that's the reason they exist. So they monitor a phone call originating from Moscow, say, of a person they find of interest. All of a sudden, that guy makes a call to someone in the US. Should the NSA simply hang up and not find out what it's all about due to a lack of warrant? Also, the technology doesn't make that immediately possible.

The courts have decided that text messages, as well as mobile tracking, do not need lawful warrants. Usually you don't apply for a warrant when you don't need one.

BTW, phone records are actually operating company business records. You don't own them.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Should the NSA simply hang up and not find out what it’s all about due to a lack of warrant?

Yes.

There, that was easy.

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Lotta people just don't understand this.

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024

148 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19144 readers

4903 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News