this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
90 points (94.1% liked)

Memes

4347 readers
61 users here now

Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bleepingblorp@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can tell you what the cost is.

Bourgeois influence.

[–] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where? In the country where they took Jack Ma's company away from him? In the country where a CPC representative has to sit on the board of directors of every company? In the country where the punishment for embezzling millions is death?

The existence of wealthy people does not mean those wealthy people have control. They have easy lives, riches, opportunities, sure, but they don't have to have influence in how the country is run.

[–] Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, the joke is that they are getting rid of bourgeois influence in exchange for this stuff.

[–] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Oh right. I was misunderstanding everything yesterday. One of those days...

[–] Jefferu_Nintendomoto@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This image is just gonna get a few more inches stapled onto it every year, isn't it?

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

this meme is never gonna die

[–] Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago

The meme will live forever, but at what cost??

[–] indred0@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

这个模因万岁!

[–] MatBC@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Out of legitimate curiosity, what are the alleged costs they usually point at?

[–] PanArab@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Yellow peril

[–] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Are you asking about coherence and reason in the narrative? What are you, a Russian bot?

[–] chesmotorcycle@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always understood it to mean the "cost" is just more capitalist accumulation. "They could be enriching their/our bourgeoisie, but instead they do this?!"

[–] MatBC@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I gather from this answers that none of this news articles never articulate any concrete cost that they alleged? Because I know that anything they could say would be skin deep at most but never anything substantiated but I expected something, I'll try to track down some of this news and check

[–] chesmotorcycle@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yep. At best they could argue that these decisions come with opportunity costs - China could have made more profit by allocating its money elsewhere.

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The west when making crap tons of weapons and bailing banks isn't free: this is fine

The west when making things better for everyone isn't free: capitalist coping not mad

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

But at what cost?

[–] big_spoon@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

at what cost? it seems that it's a lesser cost than you anyways!