116
Not guilty and 215lbs!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lies on both accounts! He’s going to prison!
And a lot more of him is going to prison then he claims!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Our sveltest and most honorable president
!He's guilty as fuck!<
Just the recorded call is enough evidence. And that's like the most we know from what the prosecutors have. So yeah, fingers crossed the MF lives long enough to be poor paying lawyers and get a huge sentence.
The government (State or Fed) never goes after anyone of this magnitude unless it's a Darryl Dawkins type slam dunk.
Meh, even if the stress kills him before he sees his day in court, I'll be okay with it. Anything to get DeSatan on the ballot is fine by me. Cause once that happens Biden is all but guaranteed a second term.
I'm not surprised this is non article. Let me know when he found guilty.
No trial date for Georgia yet, that will be next once everyone pleads and has their "I wanna be in federal court!" requests denied.
First Georgia trial is in October this year.
Yeah, but that's JUST for Chesebro and only because he requested an expedited trial.
"Speedy trial" requests have to start before 11/3 or be thrown out. Sidney Powell has requested one as well and Willis has requested hers be rolled in with Chesebro.
Willis is actually willing to do ALL of them starting 10/23, but we're waiting on the judges ruling.
Yup! 👍
I love how she called their bluff on that one.
Chucklefucks: "(If we tell them we want a speedy trial, they won't be prepared.) WE WANT A SPEEDY TRIAL!"
Fani Willis: "Let's do this."
As expected, he lied.
It's sad that one's plea isn't under oath...
Hell no. You absolutely shouldn't get to punish a citizen for putting up a defense.
Even someone who 100% committed the crime they are accused of should be able to zealously defend themselves, including pleading not guilty. The state already has too much power in prosecuting people.
Yes, Trump deserves the full force of law applied against him, but let's not give the state even more ammo against the average citizen.
Now now, think about it.
Long story short, if your plea is a lie, it should be an additional charge to keep you locked away longer. Helps disincentivize people pleading not guilty when they know they can't beat the charge and wasting everyone's time and money. Encourages plea deals.
Ok, you're a troll, I get it. But for everyone else reading this - There's already PLENTY of incentive to plea out. Too much incentive.
This is just one story, go ahead and do a search and you'll find PLENTY more - how many stories can you find just in your local paper for someone who's been in jail for 10 years before they're released with not much more than a "sorry about that, tough luck, buddy."
Cops already lie to defendants and say "we know you did it, we have 7 witnesses and DNA evidence. Just plea out and take a year of jail, or go to trial and get 20 years." The defendant has no cash for bail, has no way of getting a good lawyer, so they have a public defender. Now they ALSO have an extra "oh, and if you say you're not guilty at pre-trial, we'll add another 10 years for perjury. Good luck, sucker!"
Sure, you might think it's a good thing to lock up more people, but innocent people get locked up ALL THE TIME. Including innocent people coerced into confessing to crimes they didn't commit. You personally could very easily be one of those people someday, even if you never break the law (which itself is almost impossible.)
Finally - here's a very famous historical YouTube video explaining EXACTLY how you can get railroaded into prison without doing anything wrong - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
That would just mean anytime the state finds someone guilty they get to tack on an additional perjury charge. Pointlessly harmful.
Allow me to correct you there... Wonderfully harmful!
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
116 points (96.8% liked)
politics
19103 readers
3483 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS