1513
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Colorcodedresistor@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Is this a new trend? like Johnny depp and Amber heard !? twitch ttv would melt if they added a 'court room' tab

[-] crashoverride@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

No, big trials have pretty much always been televised

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aeternum@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

will the secret service have to guard him when he's in prison? Questions that keep me up at night lol

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago

I've said this before but the obvious solution is to reopen Guantanamo and just leave him there.

He'll have to fend off the seagulls himself.

[-] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Guantanamo never closed

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] sheogorath@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Now I know what to stream on my second monitor while working. Reminds me of the Depp v. Heard. I got that shit playing on my second monitor non stop. I'm not much of a person who likes to bicker. But watching rich people fight each other warms some part of me.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

how do they prevent disclosure of the jury?

[-] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Oh are we pretending the magats aren't going to out them as soon as the trial begins?

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

On a side note, I GUARANTEE that Kenneth Chesebro was in a frat and that the others called him Kenny Cheese-Bro.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I bet they just called him Cheese.

[-] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Yo yo K-Cheese what is UP my man

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LettuceWithBeetroot@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

I wonder if his lawyers will be as much of a train wreck as those that represented Amber Heard?

[-] Rejacked@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I got a feeling that Heard's lawyers will look like Harvard Law professors, compared to these folks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] StinkySnork@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Honestly didn't think there was ever going to be a trial more closely watched than OJ's. Guess he'll get the ratings he's always friggin obsessed with.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

"I wish to have the greatest ratings of anyone ever!"

monkey's finger curls

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] scorpious@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

So the “lawyers” for this piece of shit will make their entire presentation Victim Theater for the legions of turd followers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Productivity is going to plummet. It’s gonna be fuckin LIT.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

They interrupted my 8th grade art class to hear the OJ Simpson verdict. This is way bigger than that.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
1513 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4341 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS