this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
76 points (87.3% liked)

politics

24870 readers
3186 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 63 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wake up, dude. Young people are mad about your policy on Israel. It’s not gonna end.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He doesn't care, he knows that we're left without another choice, and he's enjoying the AIPAC money too much

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He has been a Zionist for his entire life, I don't think he needs a bribe to make bad decisions

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

He doesn't need one but I'm sure he appreciates it

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Young people are divided on Israel/Gaza.

Asked whether or not they sympathize with various groups involved in the war, we found that majorities of young Americans hold sympathy for the Israeli (52% sympathize) and the Palestinian people (56% sympathize), while they have far less sympathy for their governments (29% sympathize with the Israeli government; 32% with the Palestinian government). Seventeen percent (17%) expressed sympathy toward Hamas; for those who were presented with the information in a split sample that Hamas was an Islamist militant group, sympathy dipped to 13%.

When young Americans are asked whether or not they believe Israel's response so far to the October 7 attack by Hamas has been justified, a plurality indicates that they don't know (45%). About a fifth (21%) report that Israel's response was justified with 32% believing it was not justified.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Truth_Hurts

An apparent bug in my instance prevents me from seeing some comments, but I saw yours via the "context" button on replies. Fuck your hive mind shit. Children are being murdered. That has nothing to do with anything other than children being murdered. Suck my ass.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you context button?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the second icon beneath a comment if you look at your replies (on my instance, but I think the layout is standardized). I need it for about half of replies to make sense. Looks like this (for my instance):

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t have that on voyager but it sounds good to have

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know if your intention was to prove their point, but you did.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is that some young people are mad about Biden's policy, some likely support it, but the biggest group isn't even paying attention.

Politically, that's grounds for maintaining the status quo.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d be careful with relying on poll cross tabs on issues of morality. The sample size is usually too small to tell right from wrong.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, but if Biden is guided by his moral code instead of politics then he has even less reason to care if young people are mad at him.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Reporter: "Mr President, has the protests forced you to reconsider any of the policies with regard to the region?"

Biden: "No."

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Joe Biden's Pro Reelection Killer 2K24

[–] hark@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He spent about a couple seconds talking about free speech so that he could go on to talk about law and order, which is what he really wanted to emphasize, and that took up the majority of his stupid little speech.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Biden's speech begins at the 37:30 mark: https://www.youtube.com/live/AXLjdZbwutY

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gordian knot. He doesn't want to be anti-free speech or anti-protest, but he also can't tolerate violence or bigotry.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

but he also can't tolerate violence or bigotry.

Are you sure about that? Because supporting an active genocide kinda makes it seem like he’s ok with violence & bigotry…just not with protesters speaking up against it. If you watch any of the videos from the protest encampments, I think you’ll see that the violence & bigotry is not coming from them.