1

The puzzle itself is cool, but I actually found the explanations of the mechanism design and 3D printing techniques more interesting.

He seems to have used a linear mechanism, similar to Oskar's floating anchors approach, but without the floating anchors. My guess is that the ball shape eliminated most of the twisting forces on the pieces which necessitated the floating anchors in Oskar's design.

Flattening off small areas of the pieces to allow them to be printed in an orientation which doesn't require support bothered me a bit, but I can understand why he did it. Support material can be a pain in the ass.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

cubers

285 readers
8 users here now

Community for all things speedcubing or twisty puzzle related. Cubers and non-cubers are welcome! Drop by our welcome post to introduce yourself or send any suggestions for the community.

Rules

  1. Follow server's Code of Conduct
  2. Be kind to others
  3. No NSFW posts (family friendly community)
  4. Zero tolerance policy for any kind of harassment

Useful links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS