Linkedin : memes

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 101 points 6 months ago

AI = 0 □

[+] InputZero@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] Technus@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 months ago

(MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn't give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.

Instead you'd get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2

And that's not even the correct formula. It's

E^2 = (mc^(2))^2 + (pc)^2

You can't just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).

The way to remember this is that it's equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).

So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)

[-] Technus@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?

And where does the O(v^4) term come from?

[-] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d'Alembert operator at the end

[+] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 53 points 6 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

[deleted]

[-] Norgur@fedia.io 51 points 6 months ago

Sounds like some ~~bullshit artist~~ motivational speaker

[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 20 points 6 months ago

Probably an AI expert too

[-] Norgur@fedia.io 6 points 6 months ago

And a Bitcoin Scholar

[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 3 points 6 months ago

Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire "crypto" shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways

load more comments (6 replies)

[-] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago

It also means AI = 0

[-] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've heard about an extended version of the equation:
E^2^ = m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^
Or E = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^

If so, AI = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^ - mc^2^

I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 44 points 6 months ago

So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood..

[-] gimsy@feddit.it 4 points 6 months ago

Well math might be, physics for sure isn't

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 41 points 6 months ago

As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I'd bet money that was written by an LLM.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago

How did it lose so much quality since it was posted just a week or two ago?

[-] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 months ago

The ways of compression artifacts are mysterious.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

😆

[-] lol_idk@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Deleted

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago

yeah it reads exactly like something chatgpt would write

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 38 points 6 months ago

LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity

[-] RayJW@sh.itjust.works 31 points 6 months ago

!linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works back at it again with some more AI bs.

[-] Lemonyoda@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

Ist there actually an upcomming alternative for Job profiles and stuff?

[-] AyuTsukasa@lemm.ee 28 points 6 months ago

I love that's it's not "what are you on about?" it's just a general what

[-] Logh@lemmy.ml 33 points 6 months ago

I always found the difference between general and special whativity fascinating.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 months ago

I want to know who this idiot is.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago

his name is Chatgpt

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I mean, the equation isn't wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago

I choose to believe he's just looking for VC money and is not actually that stupid lol

[-] maculata@aussie.zone 18 points 6 months ago

I’d like to present the equation solution to all sandwich related crisiseseses: BLT+AI.

[-] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago

Bacon, Lettuce, Tomato + Avocado, Ice cream?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] wesley@yall.theatl.social 17 points 6 months ago

This reads like a post written by AI as well lol

[-] emerald@beehaw.org 12 points 6 months ago

AI+8k+5G

[-] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago

We need a = sign sonewhere, right?

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago

Nope, none of this is math.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] ultra@feddit.ro 11 points 6 months ago

they did the meth right

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

When the marketing guy tries to do a job meant for the engineering department.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Thanks for listening to my TedX talk, which I paid to present.

[-] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago

Honestly I had too many people insist that Tedx has any value

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] CPMSP@midwest.social 7 points 6 months ago

Ha! "Consultant / Technology Manager" -- pretty sure he's just working on the next buzzword buffet to justify his bloated comp package.

Oh well, gives me an excuse to link this Weird Al song that makes far more sense.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] berkeleyblue@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

He should have let an AI proofread this…

[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

It really reads like it was written by AI. I’ve never been to linkedin, maybe everyone talks like that there but it really sounds like it was written by ChatGPT

[-] onlooker@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

I like how the OP's name was censored for their privacy, but not the name of the person responding. Also, what the hell are these people huffing?

[-] Hupf@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago

Both terms are linked by a blockchain.

Memes

Rules: