248
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago

schools started becoming factories for little activist social justice warriors.

Why does education turn people progressive?

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 43 points 6 months ago

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Because conservatism as an ideology involves doing nothing and assuming you will remain the best.

Incremental improvement is literally the entire basis of education, that's how you learn. Once you get into that cycle, it's just fuckin' obvious.

[-] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 months ago

That’s a very optimistic view of conservatism. They don't want to stay the same, they want to go back in time.

[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Generally, the conservatives trying to "go back in time" are just returning to what they know. Either they lived in a time like that (because so many politicians these days are fucking geriatric), or the household they grew up in was structured that way.

Yes, there are a decent number of malicious fucks and grifters, too, but I like to give groups the benefit of the doubt. They're too lead-poisoned to know any better.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 9 points 6 months ago

When you see what humans can do, it really encourages a perspective that pushes against people that say humans can't.

[-] cowfodder@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

The person you replied to was not asking in good faith.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Oh but I am.

Conservatives try to limit what can be taught and the amount of education because their beliefs don’t hold up well to well educated critical thinking individuals.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago

Can you explain that a little more?

I don't get what you're saying because it's too vague.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not really because I'm not being serious. But at high levels of education that aren't in business, it's because education roots belief in the scientific method and scientific evidence. For the humanities, it teaches a more rigorous form of thinking based still based on evidence and logical thinking patterns.

The way modern conservatives think is very illogical. It feigns a sort of logic but it's really easy to identify as anything but

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Modern conservatives sell fear and oversimplified solutions to complex problems that will never work.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago

Words of wisdom from SatansMaggotyCumFart.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 6 months ago

I mean, yes, but what makes you think that?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Modern conservative’s policies are usually three word slogans.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 months ago

It’s a conspiracy on the highest order. The elites wanna turn your kids against you. It’s definitely not that you have shitty views.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

That’s what I thought, thanks for confirming.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I’d argue that it takes more education to support and participate in leveraging a system through systemic oppression and exploitation of those fiscally beneath you. It takes immersive learning to override natural empathy for our fellow humans. It’s just not the type of education that’s provided in school.

[-] Railing5132@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

"Moms" for liberty was founded in part by a dude in New Jersey that was up on charges for sexual assault, and another founder in Florida, a couple, the husband of which was credibly charged (and I believe pled out) to criminal sexual conduct...

That organization? The same one that the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated as a hate group? Let me see how many fucks I can find to give about what they have to say...

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, but the right (along with bothsiderist helpers all along the spectrum) has been demonizing SPLC as being invalid, corrupt, biases, etc...for a very long time now, so a lot of people now respond to any mention of SPLC with more or less: "Oh yeah? Well, SPLC are the real racists!"

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 6 months ago

I thought I could forget about these bigots after the one was undone by the sex “scandal” of fucking another woman with her husband. No such luck, I guess.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Slut shaming is so September 10th. Get with the times.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago

That's why I put "scandal" in scare-quotes.

According to this:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/moms-liberty-founder-faces-calls-resignation-school-board/story?id=107071594

She never stepped down.

Then I saw a news article that she is STILL in the board.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Well see, the Nazis were banning all those books because they were about trans science. Which also simultaneously didn't exist until 2014.

[-] AnAnonymous@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I bet they are deliberately confusing anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism to make it more publicly dramatic.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I mean the radicalized right wing and the "liberal media" have been doing that for decades, why stop now?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

LOL, Moms for Liberty.

Not one of these fascists gives a toss about "liberty".

this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
248 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2988 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS