257
The expression, "yuck my yum" mildly infuriates me.
Definitely worthy of a subtle eye roll at least. My number one would have to be “it is what it is”. They all fall under the category of “saying something without saying anything”.
But you are saying something - the subtext could be "and we can't change it". It's a way of acknowledging the situation without wanting to waste further time on it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
That's politics for ya
I don't even know what it means!
Wait: Wait, I get it now. it's along the lines of someone else's trash is someones treasure and you should not put them down because of it?
"I'm not racist." is a great statement. "I'm not racist, but" is quickly entering dangerous territory.
"I don't want to yuck your yum." is also a great statement. "I don't want to yuck your yum, but" has the same problem as the above.
That "but" is doing a lot of heavy lifting and contradicting the preceding part.
While I'm definitely one to get mildly irritated at the phrasing (and am even more irritated by "fur babies" lol), I'm really bothered by people excusing their own rudeness - right up there with saying "no offense" right before being deliberately offensive. Like if you don't want to yuck my yum or cause offense then why are you about to do it anyway?
The reason I say “no offense” is to indicate to you that my intention is something other than offending you.
For example “no offense but your breath stinks. We should stop and get some mouthwash before we get to the party”
I’m not saying that to make a person feel bad, though they will likely feel bad after I say it. I’m saying it to help them.
I’m autistic, man. If the autistic kid can figure this stuff out so can you. No offense, but maybe you should consider things you don’t understand more deeply before tossing them in the waste bin.
Thanks for your comment, certainly there are people like yourself who mean those words earnestly to convey a delicate point. I also imagine that comes out in your demeanor and character when you are saying that to someone.
Unfortunately, in my experience, many people say it without any sense of empathy or compassion at all despite the literal meaning. 😕
load more comments
(1 replies)
What about "skin dogs"
Is that like the reverse of the above, used on human children?
Exactly
I prefer "pets of the flesh"
Yeah I agree! I usually interrupt with "offense taken" before they get through their sentence.
Either say it or don't, but lets not pretend the disclaimer does anything other than act as a mild spoiler that they are about to say something edgy.
You mean people with "no filter", that if you couldn't handle at their worst you don't deserve them at their best?
Between the lines of "I don't want to" reads "I have to", which is easily disputed if said out loud.
Yeah - the whole dynamic of claiming that you don't intend to do the specific shitty thing that you then intentionally and specifically do is infuriating already, and "yuck your yum" just adds an extra layer of cringe to it.
Yeah, I've only ever seen it used as an admonishment against someone. Like, someone says something rude as fuck and they get told "don't yuck someone else's yum" ... which, isn't terrible, when it's advice being given to people acting like children.
Saying "I don't want to yuck your yum, but, the thing you like is blah-blah-blah" could easily be changed to "I'm an asshole and I think the things you like are blah-blah-blah" and the context of what was being said wouldn't change.
Hm. So are you saying it yucks your yum?
I’ve never heard that phrase before but it sounds like something I can use to annoy the piss out of my kids and their friends. Kind of like yeet, rizz, or cap. Especially if I use it wrong intentionally.
Hey cap, your yeet is pretty rizz, ong smh
Yeet makes sense. Rizz, I at least understand where it comes from (cha[rizz]ma). But I do not get "cap".
"I'm not X but <position statement that clearly requires them to be X" and "I don't want to Y but " are used by people that mistakenly believe a disclaimer provides instant absolution.
On the other hand, I've never had anybody threaten to yuck my yum in exactly those terms, and I'm slightly intrigued by the prospect.
I've only ever heard this phrase from swingers and the kink community.
are you upset about the phrase "yuck my yum" or them trashing your food, period? I mean both are mildly infuriating to me but I'm curious
edit: added much-needed comma.
Also, I've only ever heard this in the context of food (hence the "yum") but I see it's also used for other things? Which is awful, because "yum" should absolutely never refer to anything other than food
As a girl and a brit I'm mildly nauseated by the term "food period" but admittedly I have no idea what it means.
Change it to "... food, full stop." and it may make more sense.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Where do you fall on the "fur children" way of describing certain pets? I feel like this falls into a vaguely similar group of mannerisms that probably mildly infuriate a number of folks.
I have a cat. He is a pet. Not a fur baby or child. I am not a cat. He's too old to be a baby. Young cats are kittens, not babies. I also very dislike doggos and kiddos.
Not sure why I wrote all that like a four year old. Maybe because that's how I view the intelligence level of those that feel the need to use that kind of language.
I have a cat. He's the first cat I'd call a fur baby because he whines like a, um, fur baby.
Admittedly, I too say it unironically. When my cat asks for cuddles, demands to be picked up and hugged. I have every right to call him a fur baby. He definitely acts like one. That and just "kid" because he is definitely a kid. It also sounds close to the ukrainian word for cat so it's kind of perfect
load more comments
(1 replies)
Fur children, fur parents annoy me to no end
I'm generally unfavorable to any version of the word "yummy" in any context, so you have my sympathies.
I say this on purpose to annoy my friends, especially in situations where it's not needed
Ditto, I use it ironically for things that truly reprehensible. I.e. "I don't want to yuck anyone's yum, but cannibalism isn't for me."
I just heard this for the first time ... an hour ago? From a Lemmy comment.
It does sound vaguely gross to my ears. Then again, so does the word "frothy" in a way I can't explain. (But "moist" has never been an issue.)
The part that's infuriating isn't the phrase. Its a good phrase when used correctly. It's annoying that your friend is explicitly hating on your personal opinion after stating they want to respect your difference of opinion.
People have different opinions. One person's "ew" is a other person's "oooh." So never yuck someone else's yum.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/shorts/G-AHzu5c-Mg
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
load more comments
(2 replies)
It was just said a bunch by Seth Rogen in ‘Platonic,” so you’re about to hear it even more.
his yum is probably licking ass
Why did they make the asses so delicious?
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
257 points (94.2% liked)
Mildly Infuriating
35440 readers
612 users here now
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS