92
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Daft_ish@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

I don't know for sure, but there are some debates that simply don't make sense to me. For example, whether or not dark matter/energy exists is something many just absolutely insist upon. To me, I would imagine, if something exists, being "measurable" is a badge or prerequisite of its existence, but here we have a name for the black omnipresence essence everywhere, the substance of nothing, so to speak, to the point where one of the theories put forward about the gravitational anomalies in the outer solar system is that it's simply dark matter. I'm not buying it. I'm of the school of thought that what we see really is just plain nothingness. For those who constantly accuse the "it could be aliens" theory, it ranks up there to float around a go-to for everything.

Another one are the constant asteroid theories. What made the moon? An asteroid. What tipped Uranus? An asteroid. What killed the dinosaurs? ~~The ice age~~ An asteroid. It doesn't come off as very critical, especially when imprecisions are growing out of them all, for example people went from saying dinosaurs were all genocided specifically by the asteroid to some people saying there were some who became birds to some saying all of them became birds and animals to saying the asteroid did almost nothing to any whole species.

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Time (capital T) is vastly different than time (lowercase t).

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

That evolution is purely randomness + fitness landscape rather than that DNA guides the process at least somewhat. Don’t burn me alive guys

[-] Railison@aussie.zone 3 points 6 months ago

I don’t understand your point but it seems interesting. Could you rephrase?

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

The current paradigm assumes a uniform probability of mutation across all genes. But maybe there are mechanisms that say “keep this part of the genome under tighter control” and “make this other part of the genome more susceptible to mutation.”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Particle Physics

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
92 points (93.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43961 readers
1427 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS