271
submitted 5 months ago by btaf45@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 126 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago

You can probably drop the “lol” part.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 85 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] Kadaj21@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

I’m a millennial, i do it all the time lol

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] Bob_Robertson_IX@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I thought "lol" was short for "Just wanted to let you know that I'm a millennial so you can better understand where I'm coming from with this comment."

Does it have a different meaning?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Project 2025 is the culmination of 50 years 'lesser evil' voting. Instead of accepting no evil, democrats tolerated right wing politics and its policies as long as it had a D next to its name.

Marginalized communities have been living with versions of P2025 all their lives. This only scares white liberals because its something that finally targets them. Democrats demanded we ignore our oppressors and vote for them and didnt have our backs. Now we wont have theirs for the mess liberals created.

[-] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

You had me in the middle bit

[-] 4grams@awful.systems 4 points 5 months ago

I can’t argue with any of that. What I’m stuck on is just what the fuck to do now and what comes next.

Can you elaborate on your thoughts? I honestly can’t see a way out except for eating another shit sandwich and hoping that incrementalism can save us once sanity returns. But fuck, we’re cooked, sanity is gone for good so I’m out of ideas and the alternative only makes it worse for everyone. I’m at a point where I’m happy to vote against my best interests but that’s kinda what I feel I’ve been doing all this time.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Caught a sound bite of trump rambling again.

Did Hitler sound that dumb in his rallies?

[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

Hitler didn’t make it to 80. It’d be nice if trump took that note

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

As evil as Hitler was... he did at least one good thing for the world.

So far, I'm not so sure Trump has done that much.

(Hitler offed himself.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

He was also largely dismissed as a clown, like trump in 2016, that there was no way he would win.

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 17 points 5 months ago

As a German, his speeches are not dumb or incoherent as Trump's, but they are really that good either. Basically constantly screaming and a very weird cadence.

Messagewise, it's pretty close, though. MAGA and Deutschland über alles are not that different. Actually, making Germany as great as it's been before Versailles was kind of the entire point of the Nazi party (and of course The Jews™ were responsible for all of that ).

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

In his time, Hitler was ridiculed for his weird looks and barely coherent speeches. It was thought he would be ineffectual and easily controlled by more seasoned politicians when he was allowed to become cancellor (he only got about 35 percent of the popular vote but managed to build a conservative coalition). To underestimate his and his party's plan to dismantle democracy, which was plainly laid out in Mein Kampf, was a grave mistake of course. More info here: https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/germany-1933-democracy-dictatorship/

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

America first is actually another slogan of theirs so you don't even have to go that far to draw the comparison

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hitler was described as a charismatic and compelling speaker. That’s historically how he was able to capture so much of the German audience. Only once he had a strong following did he begin attacking the BBC as “Lügenpresse” (fake news), isolating Germans from trusting in international media.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah but that's how some people describe Trump. I can't fathom how one could listen to him speak without getting the impression that he's a narcissistic moron but that's how it goes I guess.

I think that begs the question of whether or not many felt that way about Hitler in 1930s Germany. I'm guessing he was well spoken enough that even those that disliked his message didn't have the same opinion of him that I do of Trump. They likely saw him as a threat and someone to fear for his ability to sway others to his cause. Trump seems successful largely in spite of himself which is odd, but again I can't see anything other than a clown with little man syndrome so maybe they are successful for largely the same reasons. They do have a lot of similarities. I just have to imagine Hitler was more cunning and less sniveling.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 20 points 5 months ago

There is no fascism without dictatorship.

Bet

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago
[-] Drusas@kbin.run 15 points 5 months ago

That is downplaying the threat.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Has been for decades

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Brilliant photo illustration.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

We've seen it, us who live outside of America and have had the pleasure of being invaded. Must be nice to use everyone else's land as battlefields and never having to fight one at home, and ignoring the atrocities and fascism committed by your armies on foreign soil.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Anyone have a non-Paywall link?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Extremely cruel, short sighted stupidity that kills many as well as so much corruption and infighting that the US government collapses. Of course, climate change is also going to make everything start to collapse soon anyway. At least the fascist savages will burn right along with everyone else.

[-] Dreizehn@kbin.social 4 points 5 months ago

Every single Allied WWII would roll in their grave and the f'n Little Austrian Corporal would be f'n proud of the f'n MAGATs.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

You’re allowed to use curse words here.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 4 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
271 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4191 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS