Could it have something to do with hundreds of thousands of the sickest boomers dying suddenly a few years ago?
No, this trend started over a decade ago. Here are some possible explanations from the article:
Some of the reductions are easy to explain. Congress changed Medicare policy. The biggest such shift came with the Affordable Care Act in 2010, which reduced Medicare’s payments to hospitals and to health insurers that offered private Medicare Advantage plans. Congress also cut Medicare payments as part of a budget deal in 2011.
...
Older Americans appear to be having fewer heart attacks and strokes, the likely result of effective cholesterol and blood pressure medicines that became cheap and widely used in recent years, according to research from Professor Cutler and colleagues. And drug makers and surgeons haven’t developed as many new blockbuster treatments recently — there has been no new Prozac or angioplasty to drive up spending. (Medicare is currently barred by statute from covering the new class of expensive anti-obesity drugs.)
Parts of the health system appear to have become more efficient, as medical providers have been more cautious about adopting new therapies without much evidence, and more care has shifted outside hospitals into cheaper settings.
Most (all?) insurance plans that charge copays for medications will give heart-related medications for free because of the cost when things like high-blood pressure our not treated.
This is both great and sad news if true. Great that it's made a big difference in the quality of later life and sad that it's largely preventable and yet nothing was done, and that there is still so much to improve with our health care system.
Considering that this is a trend that started a decade ago, probably not nearly as much as you seem to think.
Covid: "I'm doing my part!" o7
Looking at the graph, no.
The change appears to start roughly in 2010. It could possibly be ACA related. During the many attempts to repeat it the CBO estimated doing so would drastically increase medicare spending.
No, it's spending per person.
Considering the change in trend started a decade before that
TFW you don't even bother to look at the chart, let alone read the article
I am not able to read the article.
Not to mention even bother to read the article’s summary that’s available right here in the comments SMDH
Future right-wing headline: "COVID vaccinated retirees cost Medicare more money"
Maybe Ivermectin not being covered has them all seeking coverage out of Medicare?
Oh no!!! What entitlement spending scapegoat will the GOP turn to now?
I bet it involves drag queens spending welfare on wigs or something.
I bet it involves drag queens spending welfare on wigs or something.
I bet you are more right than you know. They've had the term "welfare queen" circulating for years now; they just need to repurpose and modernize it.
Are those the one turning the frogs gay…?
Hunter Biden’s dong
The politician's equivalent of "I don't know why but the code works".
I removed the comment and everything broke
//For some reason removing this comment breaks everything
The given explanation seems to be that existing methods and medications got cheaper but...wouldn't that mean all medical insurance would get cheaper?
Good joke
Hahahahahahahahaha
Prices don't go down for anything that people need to live. Not unless the government makes them do so.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.