That's really the foundational problem. If you could exist without bugging or being bugged by the neighbors dense housing would be so much more appealing
3.5% chance to get long covid if vaccinated
Estimates for the first year of the pandemic suggests that at least 65 million people globally have had long COVID
Cat cafe, you can chill in there for ages slurpin on coffee surrounded by the lil gremlins
We don't deserve our open source heroes, so grateful for the incredible free software ecosystem
Gimp, 7zip, blender, vlc, open office, the kernel, thousands of others, I feel like our lives have been universally improved by these inverted charity projects. The few taking care of the undeserving many.
I'm a 10 year pro, and I've changed my workflows completely to include both chatgpt and copilot. I have found that for the mundane, simple, common patterns copilot's accuracy is close to 9/10 correct, especially in my well maintained repos.
It seems like the accuracy of simple answers is directly proportional to the precision of my function and variable names.
I haven't typed a full for loop in a year thanks to copilot, I treat it like an intent autocomplete.
Chatgpt on the other hand is remarkably useful for super well laid out questions, again with extreme precision in the terms you lay out. It has helped me in greenfield development with unique and insightful methodologies to accomplish tasks that would normally require extensive documentation searching.
Anyone who claims llms are a nothingburger is frankly wrong, with the right guidance my output has increased dramatically and my error rate has dropped slightly. I used to be able to put out about 1000 quality lines of change in a day (a poor metric, but a useful one) and my output has expanded to at least double that using the tools we have today.
Are LLMs miraculous? No, but they are incredibly powerful tools in the right hands.
Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Who's taking fish oil supplements? People who are concerned for their health or people who are generally healthy? Observational studies like this seem much less useful than a dedicated study with properly allocated controls
At the start of the study, we asked participants to take a visual sensitivity test. For the test, they had to press a button as soon as they saw a triangle forming in a field of moving dots. People who would develop dementia were much slower to see this triangle on the screen than people who would remain without dementia
I'm more sick of the harem trope than the isekai trope, between that and fan service beach days I don't even feel like trying new shows sometimes
Ngl kaspersky is the close to the last group I care to hear from about security
I wonder if there's anyone out there who can't see their nose at all?
"you shouldn't buy food because that means there's less food available"
If people don't have AC at all when temperatures are no longer livable, people will die. This is a dumb thing to guilt an entire population into.
After how ajit pai shilled the fuck out of the chair position I don't know if I can ever take it seriously again.
Fuck ajit pai, of course.
da da da da deported 🎷🦜