I suspect so as well. But also, a clearly thinking person would pick up on the additional implication.

Would you mind elaborating? What's your issue with it?

Yes, he also said that piracy can be a personal choice, and showed how to do it.

I watched it when it came out, it's prominently featured in at least once scene.

Didudidididitidi - BITCH!

Hell is not real and no innocent goes there. I guess if we knew for sure that it existed, and didn't trust the administrators of hell to follow proper protocols, it would be similar? Like, you could say "don't wish people hell, my aunt was innocently sent there and boiled for eternity!". Though I'm willing to concede that hell, being an abstract concept beyond the arbitration of human morality, is a neat way to be malicious about bad people.

Gpt-4. I find that it's substantially more reliable.

I tried this, and it gave a decent response in my case.

https://chat.openai.com/share/dbae5fb3-e8d4-4489-b1e0-42ae8601b33a

Don't get me wrong, I think those restrictions are horrible and Putin is a tyrant, but it's irresponsible to say that VPNs are illegal. They are not. People should use them to access alternative media like Meduza instead of accepting that there's only state media. VPNs are still incredibly useful and we shouldn't play into the scare tactics of the Russian government by insinuating that you can end up in jail by using VPNs. I think that's coming, too, but these tools are still available to get around lots of the censorship. As you yourself noted, most of the VPN providers aren't actually complying with the law, so you can access way more material, without current legal repercussions to the individual, at least based on the sources you provided.

I'd appreciate a source for that statement. :o

Why can't we both discuss issues surrounding ChatGPT whilst also discussing electoral propaganda? What's with this single issue, low attention span bullshit?

This was the most ad infested piece of garbage website I've seen in a while.