[-] Buttons@programming.dev 28 points 3 months ago

Anti-trust lawyers are rubbing their hands in anticipation.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 29 points 6 months ago

Criticizing the Israel government is okay (until our government outlaws it at least). Suggesting the people of Israel are some special kind of corrupt is not okay. Our corruption is our own.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 29 points 6 months ago

Video games were such a wild west back in the 80s and 90s that it's often not clear who even owns the copyright anymore.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 32 points 6 months ago

As an programmer, I want to think out loud about possible technical solutions.

I would have kept the understandable / hand-made algorithm as the core of search results. If you want to do fancy machine learning, do it on the periphery and we can include the machine output in our algorithm and weight its importance by hand. This would allow us to back out of the decision, because we could lower the weight of the machine learning output as needed.

It sounds like Google jumped strait to including the machine learning in the core algorithm though, and now with a decade of complexity in the core algorithm they are no longer able to go back without huge effort.

In general, it's important to consider "is this a decision we can easily back out of?".

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 27 points 8 months ago

According to g.2.A.ii (in the definition of “covered company”), the law only applies to social media with more than 1,000,000 monthly active users. Not sure why that’s included.

I'm glad clauses like this are common. We don't want some teenager who wants to experiment with creating a "social media" website for his friends to have the full weight of the law immediately fall on their shoulders. People should be free to create website with minimal legal requirements, especially if it's a small website.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 28 points 8 months ago

Sing it with me...

🎵 Every sperm is... 🎵

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 30 points 9 months ago

I think the joke is that the Jr. Developer sits there looking at the screen, a picture of a cat appears, and the Jr. Developer types "cat" on the keyboard then presses enter. Boom, AI in action!

The truth behind the joke is that many companies selling "AI" have lots of humans doing tasks like this behind the scene. "AI" is more likely to get VC money though, so it's "AI", I promise.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 28 points 9 months ago

Wife's sad because you didn't buy her PC parts.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think a "let the world burn" approach to consumer agreements, like EULAs and cable TV contracts, would be interesting.

Require users to fully read every word of the contract out loud, on video, 4 times for everything they agree to.

"But it would take too long if consumers had to read our 23 page contract, they'd just give up and not sign up at all!!1"

Hmm, let's think about that...

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 27 points 10 months ago

Then on the back is a story about 3 pilots asking the tower for a speed check.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I work in tech and have enjoyed good salaries, I wish everyone was so fortunate.

As for myself, it would actually be a huge relief to know that there are many career options for me that paid just as well, because sometimes I really want to do something else. If wages had grown fairly, then a lot more people would be making 100,000+.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the brightest minds of recent generations are figuring out how to get people to watch ads. We probably could have had fusion energy by now, but instead have ads.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Buttons

joined 1 year ago