Okay you seem to be itching a scratch I have in my brain.
Good of you to point out that "balkanization" is a dishonest term, and more appropriately it is decolonization.
But I have a few more questions about Land back.
Does Land Back view white people as settlers? If so why? is it that they're descendants of settlers so them existing is a remnant of that, or only those who uphold the ideas that "America" and "Canada" exist, or something else entirely?
Now is Land Back a movement for ALL of the land to be returned to the different indigenous nations? If the notion is white people are intrinsically settlers, what do they want to do with them? If the notion is that it is just the STATE that's a settler state, does the majority of white people in these nations dillude them being Indigenous?
Now when "America" and "Canada" first colonized there wasn't a proletariat, and it was all settlers. Now as throughout time, the majority of the populations, are wage earners.
So is it fair to call white people settlers in a STATE apparatus formed centuries ago, that enslaves them?
Is it Anti Marxist to return to the way things were, discounting the new conditions formed for all working people? Is there any historical example of decolonizing a Settler State? If white people are born on native land, are they apart of that indigenous nation? Is this an issues of Nationhood and borders in general, or the specific parts of a settler state?
Again, just questions.
It's so disappointing whenever they touch on China tho 😭