[-] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

What are these "social programs" you speak of?

[-] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago

That’s a very light sentence for treason.

[-] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Yo mama so fat, yo daddy checks her for change.

[-] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I think you meant shnippet

[-] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Not that im challenging what you’re saying, I’m having difficulty understanding how that doesn’t directly counter the Gish Gallop technique effectively.

Could you elaborate? And what would be the ideal way to combat that technique in your opinion?

[-] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

If I gave your post a second glance instead of jumping straight to being snarky I could have avoided looking like an asshat.

It beats the alternative of internet strangers thinking that I'm a fascist, besides to err is human

[-] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Actually, you found an idiot that didn't read the sentence that precedes the image you shared. I deserve the downvotes, because it is me who stinks

[-] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Cool how do I put myself on the do not call list

[-] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

1.) A 5% raise doesn’t even cover inflation.

2.) No one who is serious about wanting a pay raise to stay is asking for an 67% increase in pay.

3.) Leaving because of pay is typically because someone is offering substantially more money/better benefits for a similar position.

4.) You have it backwards you definitely worry about raises in pay, especially before you get a raise of $10-20k.

5.) As someone who has made 60k/yr a raise of 6-10k would be more than enough incentive to stay. It would easily outpace inflation and reward someone who is doing well.

[-] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Or 4 Calling Birds

view more: next ›

DekesEnormous

joined 1 year ago