I don't think that's it. Things depreciate over time.
Does "fully depreciated" mean " has become an adult"?
Epstein like foot massages.
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/comp-ke-inset-maxwell.jpg?w=1125
Why would he be drawing Clinton in Epstein's birthday book? Also Epstein liked his foot massages. https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/comp-ke-inset-maxwell.jpg?w=1125
Is it time to rename the sub to okbuddyopus?
I don't look like that.
This is almost always the result of who gets included/excluded in the study. Scroll all the way down to criticisms in this link and you'll see a reasonably good discussion of it. Basically smokers tend to be leaner and have crappy outcomes, sick people or those with pre-existing health issues tend to lose weight etc. Including "lean" people who have other risk factors is the entire effect.
For the record this same effect is present in the "is one drink a day good for you?" debate. If you include people who can't drink because of medication or extreme illness the alcohol use looks good. Toss all the abstainers who aren't in peak health, and alcohol use looks very bad. The results are driven entirely by the inclusion criteria.
Get this slop outta here. If you don't know you can just not say anything.
May I introduce you to The Smiths. Rusholme Ruffians and There is a Light That Never Goes Out are great examples, but really it describes most of their catalogue.
Enjoy it. Am almost 60 and would love to be 37 again.
That's interesting. In North America this was largely litigated during the era of film photography and common law went in the other direction. You do not have control over being recorded or photographed in a situation where there is not have a reasonable expectation of privacy - at least for non-commercial purposes. Restaurants and walking around in public are classic examples of this.
I honestly wasn't even aware of jurisdictions that had an opposite approach.