[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago

That's really weird explanation on part of CF CEO, as just after DNS request you usually connect to the site which address you requested and site gets a lot more details including full IP address anyway.

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because if he's able to help anyone on SO, he very likely profited many, many times from free access to knowledge there before he got to this point. Given activity of average user he probably gained orders of magnitude more than he given.

I find rambling about money and compensation in such context distasteful.

SO provided platform which, while not perfect is used by millions of people. They aren't overloaded with ads and dark patterns as many of the clones. If it's worthless, why people are using it instead self hosted blogs for example?

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 year ago

Would you prefer SO to be paid?

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 year ago

If by "responsibly" you mean strip customers of privacy under old story of protecting children then sure.

Why are you manipulating people?

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

Right now my life is significantly better than someone who decides to live on government welfare.

30 something years ago, when we had socialism in my country it didn't matter if you worked, got drunk or slept at work. Everybody had the same shitty flat and the same shitty products (assuming there were products at all).

This system has a lot of problems, but socialism sucked indefinitely more.

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

I guess my grandparents who were "liberated" by Stalin's army were also paid off by US propaganda?

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

EU version has review process built-in. Anyways it'll be hard to get more outdated than lightning.

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 year ago

In general I strongly prefer open source, because lots of propertiary software will try to vendor lock you and then extract money from you, when it's hard to escape for you.

In this case however I can change back to Connect or other any second, so amount of control this program has is extremely minimal and experience in exchange is better.

Informed choice is better than picking and following dogma, because dogma doesn't work in some cases.

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 year ago

It was done many times for Americans if it's so important to you. Two years into war and Russian trolls still cannot get their propaganda straight.

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Chinese company is buying Polish company. Where's the place for FCC opinion here?

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Leaked emails indicate, they use iMessage to actively lock down users in their walled garden. This is area with literally zero innovation (or even regression) for past decade. At least.

Giving money to Apple basically equals to strangling innovation in exchange for getting (sometimes or even rarely) marginally better UX in boring, well explored areas.

Also once you are bought into their ecosystem you are stuck with some mediocre products like iPhone, because if you want alternative, you have to throw away watch, tv and speakers and then redo entire home automation due to lack of elementary interoperability.

view more: next ›

DzikiMarian

joined 1 year ago