"I'd rather let someone who actively, aggressively advocates, enables, and wants genocide domestically and abroad to win the presidency, over voting for somebody who passively enables genocide to happen abroad because actively trying to stop it could ignite WWIII" is still a bad take.
It's baffling and hypocritical.
“If nuclear war happens, we won’t be second in line pressing the button,”
Which means you'll be pressing the button first. Which means you're the one starting the nuclear war.
And the worst part is, I think that might actually be what me means.
He's also said that he regrets a lot of that. 🤷🏻♀️
Republicans will take away social security, blame Democrats, and their voters will believe them.
To the fascist, hypocrisy is a feature. It's a tool that removes restrictions for themselves while it restricts others. It's a flex; their strength is so great it can't be bound by internal consistency or mental consonance.
To the fascist, if hypocrisy grants them more power then it's a good thing
secure housing, with no food insecurity, medical care, and plenty of hygiene supplies
So ... Prison, right? We're talking about prison?
People love looking at the first civil war in conversations like this, but the next civil war is going to be nothing like it. For a likely comparison, you'd have to look at the Spanish Civil War and The Troubles in Ireland.
Americans have no fucking clue what they're asking for.
Great example of how fascists view the law as something to oppress others, not to restrict themselves. "Law and order (for thee not for me)"
Things are bad right now, really bad, but they're not as bad as they were in the 90s. Not even close.
That's just how bad the 90s were.
Correct, he he follows through with his threat then he will lose when it goes to court.
So all he has to do is delay his action until right before the election, so the court can't react in time and its decision ends up coming after the election is over. At that point, because America as proven time and again that it won't redo an election no matter how flagrantly election laws are broken, it won't matter and he'll have gotten away with it.
The 14th Amendment doesn't require a conviction, and innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply because this is a civil suit.
I'll be surprised if this doesn't go all the way to SCOTUS though.
Kyle Rittenhouse of all people recently called out Trump as being bad for the second amendment, and the folks on the right retaliated by accusing him of being trans
Seriously, there were people analyzing photos of him "proving" that he was born female. And when he retracted his comment, they dropped the whole thing.
It's fucking wild