Ironically making them more corrosion resistant, by doing so....

The problem is, you don't know if it'll bounce till you try.

The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

So, fucked up public transport is a necessity?

You don't know why you don't ask women if they're pregnant?

Sacrifice? Tf you on about?

When they sacked Clarkson for hitting a producer, I was like: But he also punched Morgan, shouldn't he, like, get one free for that?

I only ever use those sites if i really disliked a movie but can't figure out why.

As a way to select a movie they're really pointless, I think a system that matches tastes of people and recommends movies based on that would be more promising.

Sure does! But nothing will happen, you're essentially a 100% safe running pump and dump schemes as long as you only rip off poor people.

Check out Coffeezilla's yt channel, there's loads of obvious fraudsters out there, nothing ever happens to them.

It isn't. Just as declaring yourself a sovereign citizen isn't a loophole for whatever idiots claim it's a loophole for, declaring illegitimate use legitimate isn't a loophole.

Actual examples for legitimate use: Storing someone's address if he wants to send you something, using someone's IP-address to serve him data while he's on your site.... If it's necessary it's legitimate.

Deutsche Bahn is being sued right now just because of this, here's the initiative that is suing them: https://digitalcourage.de/

Send a few bucks their way instead of spreading false information on the Internet.

Tis is not not ok, actually. I'm a software dev for a European company. I'm briefed by our lawyers.

"Legitimate use" isn't just a phrase from cookie law, it has a very specific meaning.

What's legitimate use? Well, any data I necessarily have to store for our business relation I can store. For as long as I need it. For example: You want me to send you something? Gonna need to store your address. After I sent the package I don't have any need for your address any more so I'd need your explicit consent to store it longer.

Another example for what is considered personal data: IP addresses. Which I store for as long as you watch my site, so that would be another example for a legitimate reason to store personal data.

Still I don't get why they display this banner. To my knowledge it's not necessary to inform the user about storage for legitimate reasons.

All that said, there's plenty of examples of companies illegitimately storing personal data, google is a good example they were sued only yesterday (fitbit)

Ja - die Politik ist halt auch durch den grünen Koalitionspartner geprägt. Die Kommunisten glänzen durch soziales Engagement (die Bürgermeisterin behält von ihrem Gehalt nur einen Bruchteil - genaueres bitte selbst googeln, kann sogar sein dass das für alle Gemeinderäte gilt), was Menschen mit Kompetenz angeht, ist die Besetzung halt ein wenig dünn.

Nach Jahrzehnten, in denen der ÖVP-Bürgermeister hauptsächlich befreundete Bauunternehmer subventioniert und Graz damit finanziell enorm belastet hat eine willkommene Abwechslung.