[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Needs to have a couple of examples of corporate changes and their relative impacts just to put it into perspective

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I think it's important to realize that almost everyone is at least occasionally a sucker. There's a grift that targets basically every personality type. There's grift for health conscious folks, for worried parents, for 'I'm so much smarter than others', for gamers, for outdoorsy types, there's something for everyone. If you aren't careful you'll be laughing at the other 'idiots' while you yourself fall into a different trap.

Honestly once you start paying attention it's really scary how many different and seemingly totally unrelated topics can be used to pull people into facism. So many times I've clicked on a different YouTube video or something and then all the sudden my feeds been taken over by right wing bullshit.

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Yep the flaw is assuming that humans would actually select for constructive comments. It's a case where humans claim that's what they want, but human actions do not reflect this. We'd eventually build yet another 'algorithm that picks what immediately appeals to most users' rather than 'constructive'. You'd also see the algorithm splinter along ideological lines as people tend to view even constructive comments from ideologies they disagree with unfavorably

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Sims is pretty popular and the main version everyone plays is PC only, but can be run on laptops and other low end PCs. There are a lot of 'I only play Sims' people out there. Could account for some of the numbers

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Yep. This is totally good enough to outsource PR speak to AI. ChatGPT has this down pat.

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Same kinda logic as people who complain about ads saying that they'd rather pay for the service, instead of ads. The reality is only about 1% ever do pay. I assume it's similar for clothing, where most people naturally gravitate towards the clothes that look 'best', even if they don't have pockets.

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Blame chrome. Autofill doesn't include .com? Welp, guess I'll just hit the top search link instead then.

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Lemmy has fully replaced Reddit for my casual scrolling needs. But for research purposes for things like buying advice, tech support, etc I still find myself at Reddit. Lemmy may get there someday, but it's not there yet.

I didn't delete my account because I hate permanently removing information from the internet. I get annoyed when links are dead or information is lost. I understand why others are doing it, but I can't help but be sad at all the information we've lost and I won't contribute to that.

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Same. I signed up for the first instance someone mentioned positively. Seems fine, only about 5 minutes of research invested

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I honestly don't know how anyone manages without one these days. How would you even keep track of it all? Even if you go the 'same password for everything' route of horrible security, different websites have different requirements for both username and password. Wouldn't be able keep it all straight at all.

I personally use 1password, which is better than Lastpass for sure. Probably not as good as Bitwarden, but I'm too lazy to switch a second time.

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

I get it. But I also hate how useless the internet has now become for me. Kept trying to do research on a topic the other day and kept ending up at private subreddits or reddit comments with nothing but deleted comments. It will take years (if ever) for that kind of knowledge to grow again. I'm just completely at the mercy of random SEO crap reviews or gut instinct now when I need to research stuff to buy.

[-] Greenskye@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago

Yep. The Fediverse has a lot of growing room in the QOL department and is hampered by the relatively small (and often part time) dev teams working on it. Meta comes in, builds a compatible platform, then starts offering meta-platform only 'improvements' that offer those QOL features. Rest of the Fediverse dies out because 'meta' isn't that bad and they aren't abusing their position (yet).

view more: next ›

Greenskye

joined 1 year ago