No idea what you mean and not gonna read the ipcc report now.
They don't even say that. They say emissions will peak which is en par with other institutions.
Have you read the article? Hydrogen is developed... fast...
The strategy is being implemented, infrastructure being build. Electrolysers and hydrogen ready NGs are planed and build. New NG infrastructure is hydrogen ready. What else are you expecting? Should things magically materialise?
Now you are getting away from arguments...
Well... It's the current strategy.
Also, the same could be said about NG [efficiency about 30%-55% and also a little bit flameable].
In the EU, hydrogen. Either by fuel cell or burnt in hydogen ready NG plants. Wouldn't be my first choice but thats whats gonna happen.
Its really easy to find this sources but I really dont know what you want to know. Maybe about being expensive? Slow?. There is literally tons of material out there... The other guy took the one thing that could maybe be argued about, CO2 emissions.
Sometimed I am astonished that people post in a forum without being able to comprehend text
We find that larger-scale national nuclear attachments do not tend to associate with significantly lower carbon emissions while renewables do.