[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Some critics argue that the prestige of the Prize in Economic Sciences derives in part from its association with the Nobel Prizes, an association that has often been a source of controversy. Among them is the Swedish human rights lawyer Peter Nobel, a great-grandnephew of Alfred Nobel.[40]

Nobel accuses the awarding institution of misusing his family's name, and states that no member of the Nobel family has ever had the intention of establishing a prize in economics.[41] He explained that "Nobel despised people who cared more about profits than society's well-being", saying that "There is nothing to indicate that he would have wanted such a prize", and that the association with the Nobel prizes is "a PR coup by economists to improve their reputation".[40]

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

No idea what you mean and not gonna read the ipcc report now.

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

They don't even say that. They say emissions will peak which is en par with other institutions.

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

Have you read the article? Hydrogen is developed... fast...

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

The strategy is being implemented, infrastructure being build. Electrolysers and hydrogen ready NGs are planed and build. New NG infrastructure is hydrogen ready. What else are you expecting? Should things magically materialise?

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

Now you are getting away from arguments...

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

Well... It's the current strategy.

Also, the same could be said about NG [efficiency about 30%-55% and also a little bit flameable].

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

In the EU, hydrogen. Either by fuel cell or burnt in hydogen ready NG plants. Wouldn't be my first choice but thats whats gonna happen.

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Its really easy to find this sources but I really dont know what you want to know. Maybe about being expensive? Slow?. There is literally tons of material out there... The other guy took the one thing that could maybe be argued about, CO2 emissions.

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website -3 points 9 months ago

Sometimed I am astonished that people post in a forum without being able to comprehend text

We find that larger-scale national nuclear attachments do not tend to associate with significantly lower carbon emissions while renewables do.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Hugohase

joined 10 months ago