InternetPerson

joined 2 years ago
[–] InternetPerson 1 points 1 year ago

*Except if you want to do ~~good~~ science. ~~Good~~ scientists will identify false confidence and will aim to steer well clear of it

If someone isn't already doing that, they're not scientists.

[–] InternetPerson 1 points 1 year ago

Fake it until you make it?

[–] InternetPerson 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When dealing with a busy person in a professional context;

  • Emails should be as short as possible while still conveying the needed information, don't make a busy person excavate the relevant info from somewhere near the middle of the fifth paragraph.
  • Whenever possible phrase a question in a way that can be answered in one word.

Not a fan of this. Feels like a result of over-optimization in a capitalistic, profti-driven society.

We are humans. Not machines. So treat each other like that. If you like to write a couple of more words to express yourself or some issue in a way that feels representing, go for it. Doesn't mean to escalate this into a novel, but it's fine to take a pause and talk more.

[–] InternetPerson 3 points 1 year ago

Hell, it even goes for people. Leave them a little happier, a little wiser, a little more prosperous than before.

I like that. Thank you. I'll try.

[–] InternetPerson 1 points 1 year ago

What if you can't find the true problem?

[–] InternetPerson 1 points 1 year ago

Much better version.

[–] InternetPerson 1 points 1 year ago

Still looking for it.

[–] InternetPerson 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Form your opinions critically, don't easily judge.

[–] InternetPerson 23 points 1 year ago

Daypeople society sucks for Night Owls.

[–] InternetPerson 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My wife got a job where it is required and she still struggles to sleep early enough.

[–] InternetPerson 2 points 1 year ago

The person has the knowledge that this is going on.

Not necessarily, no. It could be that they might just think they've misplaced their socks. If you've lived in an apartment building with shared laundry spaces, it's not so uncommon to loose some minor parts of clothing. But just because they don't get to know about it, it's not less wrong or should be less illegal.

In he situation with AI nudes, the actual person may never find out.

Also in connection with my remarks before:
A lot of our laws also apply even if no one is knowingly damaged (yet). (May of course depend on the legislation of wherever you live.)
Already intending to commit a crime can sometimes be reason enough to bring someone to court.
We can argue how much sense that makes of course, but at the current state, we, as a society, decided that doing certain things should be illegal, even if the damage has not manifested yet. And I see many good points to handle it that way with such AI porn tools as well.

[–] InternetPerson 3 points 1 year ago

That's why we need strong legislation. Most countries wordlwide are missing crucial time frames for making such laws. At least some are catching up, like the EU did recently with their first AI act.

view more: ‹ prev next ›