[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He is an ambiguous person. He certainly did a lot of good things, but there were mistakes and even from our point of view, quite cruel decisions. It is difficult to assess why he made certain decisions. There is a lot of unconfirmed information and ambiguous accusations around him, although, of course, there are bad decisions, maybe we don't know all the information, or maybe he was wrong. It was a difficult time back then. According to some reports, at the end of his life, even Lenin treated him ambiguously and was afraid of the concentration of power in one hand and even wrote a letter to the congress, but some doubt this, so it may not be true. To truly understand this, you need to be a historian and read a lot of original documents by yourself. But I don't think that we should consider him only a complete villain, as he is often exposed.

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sorry for this website it's not some special website, just one of many website describing the experiment. You can search in internet for better site with review of this experiment(Extended Wigners Friend Experiment).

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I use lxqt mostly beacause it's simple and moderately lightweight.

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No is not such a pleasant decision in this question, in order to answer this way you need to really feel or witness really bad things. Therefore, a large number of such answers says something...

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you. Looks like.

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hard to imagine that they so low skilled. If FSB really want to install a backdoor, it will be so low-level that more of a hard work will be required to detect it.

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Something like a joke about this:

If you're working on something genius great, no matter who's watching you, they won't understand anything, but if you're doing ordinary things, it's really not that important that someone is watching.

But of course, annoying comprehensive surveillance, especially from commercial companies, certainly should not be justified.

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Thank you very much for your reply. I support your opinion in a way that I am already inclined that a complete prohibition on the training of "AI" models on the source code of software is not a very good solution and is difficult to limit according to current laws. I hope somtimes someone smart will come up with some approaches to such problems.

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's a good idea. Now I have to think about how to formulate it better and what it will mean. :)

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLfFWXUNJ_I It's more of one playlist than a channel about quantum mechanics on Russian, but as I see it has English subtitles. A fairly clear explanation with a small amount of simple mathematics, probably the minimum that is possible. It helps to understand at least a little such a complex and illogical science for the average layman.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

JustVik

joined 4 weeks ago