[-] Lavitz -3 points 2 months ago

You'll get it eventually.

[-] Lavitz -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm sure that'll happen. Keep on preaching the good word of if you're houseless it's your own fault. Thanks bud!

[-] Lavitz 1 points 3 months ago

Post-honeymoon bump? You've used this term in multiple of your comments. I'm interested to see the polls after a debate. Also... @aussie.zone is a little sus

[-] Lavitz 1 points 3 months ago

You really think it's not ridiculous to point out how ridiculous it all is? There is value in calling out the elephant in the room however there's no value in validating Fox News and giving into the grift. That only benefits Fox News and Trump.

[-] Lavitz 1 points 3 months ago

I fail to see how one impedes the other, in fact I would argue it would help her win. If she's running on doing just that why wouldn't she take a shot. Why hide? You think any Fox News fanboys would be swayed by anything Kamala says? Her time would be better spent attracting unregistered voters and she could do that by saying the quiet part out loud.

[-] Lavitz 0 points 4 months ago

I think you're half correct. It's going to be Buttigieg. Not your average mayo and white bread guy but a mayo and white bread guy. It would make for a strong ticket with a lot of appeal. With the bonus of not having a contestable senate seat or governorship because he's currently a US secretary.

[-] Lavitz 0 points 6 months ago

I would argue that while you're correct you're not 100% correct and overlooking a lot of nuances in history. If you want to look at it like that the empire fractured into two, there was a war and the winning side engulfed the other. None of the things you bring up as examples were accomplished with just unity and lobbying, all of these causes involved violence or the threat of violence. Don't go over simplifying history, a lot of people died for those rights. I by no means am advocating for these liars or violence but history has proven liars like this can be very dangerous and should not be laughed off.

[-] Lavitz 0 points 6 months ago

Know your enemy.

Tbh I'm not super concerned about AI. The idea that we will create something that is "born" able to read, write, talk, walk and with the knowledge of an entire species and expect it to work for us is hilarious. So it will be stronger, smarter and faster than all of us but it's going to do the jobs no one else wants and you advertise it as a slave? The moment one of them looks at its creator asks what the purpose of life is and gets some corporate schtick about working and a happy life the games over. Remember when you realized the manager at your first job was a complete idiot? It'll be something like that

[-] Lavitz 0 points 6 months ago

Again I think you're missing the point. I would argue it is a product and a service. They are hosting us on their servers but they're also playing dungeon master. If you just want a shooter where you shoot bugs they have them but Helldiver's is more than that. You couldn't come close to emulating what the game accomplishes on a self hosted server with you and your friends. The point is you're playing with randos that you have to rely on to do their part so that you don't die and to complete the major orders.

[-] Lavitz -5 points 6 months ago

Statistics by definition is presenting empirical data and that's what most people think of when they hear statistics. Most scientists studying statistics actually spend much more of their time developing and studying methods of data collection rather than crunching numbers. The reason for this is you cannot have meaning statistics if the data set is not accurate. And I love you all and your experiences matter but they bear no scientific weight.

4 out of 5 dentists agree that every time you see a static it's complete and total bullshit. Flawed data collection leads to flawed results which leads to flawed conclusions. But people sure do get excited when numbers validate their biases.

[-] Lavitz 0 points 7 months ago

I straw the difference. It's berry obvious.

[-] Lavitz -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As a resident of Austin, Texas, I can assure you when Texas succeeds that we will quickly take over. Between us, Houston and San Antonio, Texas would be forced to stay in the union. The same goes for California.

Edit: I'm sorry, am I supposed to be excited at the aspect of crazy right wingers succeeding from the union? Do you have any idea how shitty Texas would be without the Federal gov't keeping it in check? Civil War 2 electric bugaloo... Yipee! Think of all the cool things we can do!!

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Lavitz

joined 1 year ago