Maybe with a schema that allows a one time verify, and then churns your entry. If that verify occurs upon entry synchronously at the time you vote, if possible, that'd be no less safe than the paper ballot you feed into the machine.
Lemming6969
joined 2 years ago
No different than how it's recorded today. We can improve from there but it's not worse with the upside of a public ledger.
This is the exact use-case for a blockchain, a public immutable ledger where you can validate your vote, but nobody can tie it back to you.
Absolutely not
Unclear on the crowdsourced features of there are any, like things in the road, police, etc?
That's totally untrue. Skin will return to normal temperature from any momentary increase in seconds at most. The cooling effect does other things.
Take a cup of milk and a cup of sugar and some cinnamon and that's what these fat fucks are freaking out over.
The right of the people would be interpreted to be citizens 100% guaranteed.
You mean 4 and 6
Except learning in this context is building a probability map reinforcing the exact text of the book. Given the right prompt, no new generative concepts come out, just the verbatim book text trained on.
So it depends on the model I suppose and if the model enforces generative answers and blocks verbatim recitation.
view more: next ›
This is how you concentrate evil, and doing so in a huge area with the most power and resources is a bad idea.
The better idea is to organize, spread the good out, beat gerrymandering, beat FPTP, regulate campaign funding and special interest lobbying, change the laws, bring back evidence based policy making expert council, and crush the enemy.... Or be crushed and or ousted yourself.