When everything's a logic block, nothing will be

Reject tradition

Embrace scratch

As stated lower down in the thread, there are more options than just suburban sprawl and tight apartment buildings.

And apartment buildings aren't the only high density options available. Half the issue is just the bans on subdivisions and requirements for minimum parking, lawn setbacks, etc.

There is a great deal of difference in density between these options:

I can understand not wanting to live in a multi story apartment building. But for those people, some percentage of them would still be ok with one of the first two images here. We don't all have to go with the third one if we want something more independent.

But the conversation is implicitly about how we should be building going forward.

This is pretty much what's happened with my latest character.

I'm playing a reborn/dragonborn, who had previously tried to fight Strahd but lost. And a part of that loss means that my character lost a good chunk of his memories of fighting Strahd before.

But Strahd still remembers my character. So it has lead to some interesting interactions.

In the original position, one is asked to consider which principles they would select for the basic structure of society, but they must select as if they had no knowledge ahead of time what position they would end up having in that society. This choice is made from behind a "veil of ignorance", which prevents them from knowing their ethnicity, social status, gender and, crucially in Rawls's formulation, their or anyone else's idea of how to lead a good life. Ideally, this would force participants to select principles impartially and rationally.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_position

This post is how I found out about this 2nd attempt.

You're basically saying that there is zero overlap in the venn diagram of third party voters and blue voters, yet you make efforts to convince blue voters to go third party. You know damn well that there is overlap between third party voters and blue voters, otherwise you'd never talk to them.

Even if you personally would never vote blue, third party voters are not a monolith, there are third party voters that are closer to the DNC than you are.

Yet you didn't provide explanation for why it's bullshit. Because you know it isn't. It's right in front of you.

A spoiler is something that only exists in the mind of Liberals

Dude, I already showed it to you.

Election report for election "Plurality 2 Candidates"
Total people: 1047
11% of people supported the winner.

Kruger - 112 votes - WINNER
Sahl - 111 votes

Election report for election "Plurality 3 Candidates"
Total people: 1047
10% of people supported the winner.

Sahl - 109 votes - WINNER
Kruger - 93 votes
Maikol - 91 votes

The overlap of two circles means there will be an area shared in between. That's the math, you can't get around that.

Another way to think about it, at some point even at McDonald's you'd get fired for poor hygiene if you constantly showed up to work smelling awful. That standard should especially apply to a diplomatic role in government.

But yeah, this is bottom tier reason not to elect him.