I mean, they DO site their sources. It's in the description.
Satan has amassed an impressive list of biblical scholars ready to reveal the "standard stuff" taught in Christian seminaries: Bart Ehrman (UNC Chapel Hill), John J. Collins (Yale), Dale Allison (Princeton Seminary), Susan Niditch (Amherst), Ron Hendel (UC Berkeley), and Hector Avalos (Iowa State). This is established seminary curriculum about biblical history, biblical morals, authorship claims, and early Christianity — a curriculum never shared with the congregation.
They even show clips of those experts reading from well-cited books like Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence or The Apocalyptic Imagination. You can go read those or others of multi-hundred page books shown if you want the definitive evidence, but in this case this wasn't about "here's the hard evidence". Especially since people don't change their minds if you present evidence like that.
It's supposed to consolidate information and help people start the process to questioning some things that maybe were once set in stone. Not fully change change minds or be referenced as a resource.
Care to elaborate on how? or what could have been done differently? For a free video on the internet, I'd say it's pretty good.
FY2024YTD is from October 1, 2023 to now, so that doesn't mean 7 days, it's more like 3 months.
EDIT: Added YTD because I derped.
You may be remembering the study from almost 10 years ago where a whole bunch of men got injections and some stopped because they got severe acne. Now, that seems like a wimp thing to do. It doesn't include the fact that some men had wild mood swings with it (doesn't happen with womens pill), one developed severe depression, and one successfully committed suicide.
I also disagree with the wording from NPR - men didn't "complain" about the side effects, they REPORTED them. Because they were on a clinical study. And that's what you do on clinical studies.
The boards overseeing the trial stopped it at that point. The men that stayed in on the trial would have kept going if they could have, even with the side effects. So no - men can and have dealt with the side effects.
"stealthing" is also a thing now. It's just women claiming to be on the pill to men instead of vice versa. Trust between two people always has to be there, and some people will break that trust to get their parts licked. It's human nature, not a man vs woman vs NB thing.
Stealthing still going to be a problem with STIs, even with a pill/injection male contraception. Condoms are still going to be necessary.
Not really. After working with CentOS (RIP) for a half decade, that Firefox version was so out of date I was practically in diapers when it came out. Getting the latest version of Firefox was such a pain that my org didn't bother even if it would have given us some niceties.
LTS and other "enterprise" distros don't push the latest version precisely because of dependencies.
Why would they spell out that sort of requirement? You are assuming they are operating in the open, in good faith.
They have a history of doing this sort of thing.
I don't think the IMF or anybody should be screwing over borrowers but at least it's in the open where you and I, the concerned public, can do something.
At what point do people start protesting?
Also, in what world is 'modify' not an equivalent word to 'transform'? The literal DEFINITION is "verb. ['ˈmɑːdəˌfaɪ'] cause to change; make different; cause a transformation."
They called it like "alpha+" or something. But yeah, I think I've only had a couple of bugs over the two+ years I've been playing. I've had more bugs in fully released AAA titles.
Definitely scratches the itch my friends and Ihadd
Its got a team doing active updates, too. Been playing for a couple of years now and its only gotten better.