[-] Stalinist_Dishrag@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago

I've been thinking about your third bullet point a lot lately. I genuinely think that the lack of irl social interaction these days is far more pernicious than anyone wants to acknowledge. I don't think it's social media and technology that are the problem, rather, the LACK of third places and irl social interaction is the problem, if that makes sense.

[-] Stalinist_Dishrag@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I'll go in order.

  1. Don't know enough to comment on.

  2. Don't know enough to comment on.

  3. I have a healthy skepticism of this idea. I have a friend who very strongly believes the Fort Detrick theory on Covid's origins to be real, and he's almost convinced me. It's more likely than the Wuhan Lab theory, though that's a very low bar, to be fair. People were making the same claim about Monkeypox this past summer, even though there's been an ongoing outbreak in Africa, especially Nigeria (iirc), since 2017, which is where patient 0 of last summer's outbreak had recently traveled to. It's a small world, never doubt that.

  4. I don't doubt that ventilators are difficult to operate, and that many people who were put on them died. But a medical intervention/treatment doesn't have to be effective for the vast majority to be effective for some -- and therefore a worthwhile investment. The medical industry in the U.S. has been privatized to hell and is therefore driven by profits. But people working in the medical field are by and large decent people who want to help their fellow humans.

  5. Highly, highly doubt.

  6. Highly doubt as well.

  7. Unfortunately, VERS is known to be infested with anti-vaxx shitheads falsely claiming bad side effects. It is not a reliable source.

  8. Total nonsense.

  9. Highly doubt. The way I understand it is that because it's more common to encounter Covid than, idk, tetanus, it's necessary to get boosters more often.

  10. This a known, albeit rare, side effect that occurs within a pretty short time frame of having gotten the vaccine -- about 2 weeks, iirc.

I think it's a good idea to bear in mind that just because something or someone calls themselves a Marxist doesn't mean they're based, intelligent, or have good takes. Nazbols exist, after all.

[-] Stalinist_Dishrag@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

It'll likely never come to pass, but my choice would be either China or Cuba.

[-] Stalinist_Dishrag@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you, comrade!

[-] Stalinist_Dishrag@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you! I'll check out that list.

[-] Stalinist_Dishrag@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I am absolutely fascinated with the cultural response to this show...I've never seen it but I'm tempted to watch it for curiosity's sake, though what I already know about it I don't like very much.

There seems to be a lot of casual misogyny in the show (Eleven, Max, and Joyce mostly existing to be shipped). A few years ago I watched a Pop Culture Detective YouTube video about the trope where a boy/man stalks a girl/woman he likes until she caves. Apparently that trope is in Stranger Things, with a black boy stalking a white girl. So there's a racist element to that, too.

Another thing I can't stand in media is when it's set in a certain era, yet doesn't seem to say anything about that era. Why is Stranger Things set in the 80s? As best as I can tell, it's because the directors are nostalgic for their childhoods. I feel like this show is also the prefect example of how nostalgia is often incidentally or explicitly a tool for fascism. Like, they have to put ~Cold War~ stuff in there and be relentlessly anti-communist. Why? Because the 80s were like that! And people are like "it's just accurate to the time!" Maybe so, but why choose to include this specifically? There are also people using this excuse to be rather homophobic, claiming that gay people didn't exist in the 80s, or weren't as common. AIDs pandemic aside, this also proves how nostalgia is a tool for fascism. The general public has very warped views of what certain time periods were like, and it's not totally due to ignorance on their part, it's because an agenda has been pushed, typically by the far right. Also apparently the two gay characters in the show (one canon and the other heavily implied) were treated like garbage in the most recent season. So there's that!

Eleven is the only character in the show who really interests me, since she seems cut from the same cloth as characters like Rei Ayanami, Anthy Himemiya, Crona Gorgon, etc. which I am an absolute sucker for (in case my pfp didn't make it obvious). But I genuinely cannot do high school romance (with one exception...Revolutionary Girl Utena my beloved...and that show is less about romance and more about cycles of abuse and how these fairy tale ideas of romance perpetuate them), especially when the narrative makes it seem like the be-all-end-all. Like, isn't Eleven a girl who escaped from a lab where she was being tortured and experimented on? I feel like with that premise there's so much to explore with this character and yet they shoved her into a relationship and made that her main deal, as best as I can tell. Like, when I was in high school I had a massive crush on one of my closest friends but now that I'm several years out of high school I can't believe that actually happened. It seems so, well, juvenile. Every few weeks I remember the whole ordeal and I'm like "was that real?" Lol.

Sorry for writing a novel...I guess I just needed a place to collect my thoughts about this show.

[-] Stalinist_Dishrag@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Do you have any other works to recommend? I have a PDF of Walter Rodney's How Europe Underdeveloped Africa downloaded that I plan to start on in the next week or so.

0

There's 2 questions in this post, really.

  1. I started reading J. Sakai's Settlers the other day. I'm finding it very informative and enlightening so far. I'm about a quarter of the way through it. However I have read in various communist spaces online that its a very flawed work that smears William Z. Foster as a racist, that the author is a C.I.A. plant, that the author is a ultra/Maoist, etc. I haven't studied the communist movement throughout American history too much so I honestly don't know a lot about Foster but from what I gather from doing some Googling, he's a pretty beloved figure. This is definitely a gap in my knowledge. Are any of these criticisms founded?

  2. Is the 4th of July a reactionary holiday? I feel like I'm going bonkers because (against my better judgement) I've been going back and forth with someone arguing whether it is or isn't. I don't think any principled communist should be voluntarily celebrating the holiday for reasons that I consider obvious. The holiday is about celebrating America and being uncritically patriotic. The person I'm arguing with is stating that it's not a reactionary holiday, that America gaining independence from England led to the collapse of the British empire (even though England still has several colonies right now as I'm typing this?), and that communist leaders such as Mao and Castro understood the revolutionary war to be a positive development. Which I don't really disagree with, I don't think England losing a colony is a bad thing. But saying "this was one domino out of hundreds that led to slightly more favorable conditions" is different than celebrating. What is the ML take on the 4th of July? Am I completely off base?

Stalinist_Dishrag

joined 2 years ago