[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

I think that any operating system that mostly runs 3rd party software should be legally required to open-source at least the components necessary to run said 3rd party software. Also, OSes should just straight up not be allowed to show ads, full-stop. Making people buy hardware and then bloating the OS with ads in updates is a bait and switch and if our government had any balls, would be illegal.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Did you just refer to yourself in the third person again? Why?

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago

Sentient and capable of suffering are two different things.

Technically true, but in the opposite way to what you're thinking. All those capable of suffering are by definition sentient, but sentience doesn't necessitate suffering.

Whether they can feel suffering like ants can is an unsolved scientific question

No it isn't, unless you subscribe to a worldview in which sentience could exist everywhere all at once instead of under special circumstances, which would demand you grant ethical consideration to every rock on the ground in case it's somehow sentient.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Elementary school*

All you do is double CLICK the fucking FILE. Your web browser will open it for you.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

"Drowning out" less populated areas with more populated areas is a non-issue that conservatives pretend is a bad thing because it's in their interest to do so. The less popular ideas being drowned out by the more popular ones is fundamentally how democracy is supposed to work. What they really want is to maintain the status quo where some people's votes are worth several times more than others just because they live in a less densely populated region. Land shouldn't vote. Borders shouldn't vote. Corporations shouldn't vote. PEOPLE ARE THE VOTERS.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

HA, I hope you're joking. Surely nobody's actually done that, right? ....Riiiight?

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Program exited with code -1

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

You're both right. It's possible to write code that gets linted well in Python, yes, but you're often not working with just your code. If a library doesn't use typing properly, not a lot to be done without a ton more effort.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

YT ads will never be unblockable. They legally have to be indicated somehow and people will always write software to detect them. Worst case scenario, you have to download videos you want to watch ahead of time.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Yup. This isn't an anti-piracy thing, it's a fuck-over-people-who-don't-like-google thing.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

It's easy on Reddit because they have their own username generator when you sign up, but the usernames being used here are very telling. Random letters is literally the absolute bare minimum effort for randomly generating usernames. A competent software engineer could make something substantially better in an afternoon and I feel like an adversarial nation-state would be using something like a small language model trained solely on large lists of scraped usernames.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

The first time yeah, but I tried it again on another instance and it was better (at least it didn't fail to load half the time), but still super slow. The 2nd time is what I was talking about.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Starbuncle

joined 2 months ago