I've never understood the "more people eating at home" argument for hight food prices. The same amount of food is being bought even if a restaurant is buying less. Like food magically doesn't get eaten or needed more based on people eating at home or eating out. The food would just be going to the grocer instead the restaurant directly. Or am I misunderstanding this?
Suburbanl3g3nd
joined 2 years ago
Forgot battletoads exists I guess
Nah. My mone is on a new and transformative way to fuck the end user over via a more scummy battle pass thing
All the big news channels are propaganda and entertainment machines in their own way. A majority of voting Americans are hooked into all of that trash TV
In the hand under the phone, which of those five fingers is the thumb? I don't think you can physically hold your hand in this way
Just take the doorknob off.... They're on the inside. With the screws. Takes like 5 minutes
It's one of those things where I didn't know until I was in my 30s and figured imagining things meant thinking about them and not actually seeing them.
If you don't know what it's like you can't miss something, ya know? But there are experiments that are trying to give visualisations to aphantasia folk. I'm not sure I'd try it because then I would be missing something.
But, big pro: I can see absolute horrific stuff and I'll never be able to reimagine it. Describe a vile, nasty car wreck? Can't see it but I know it's bad. It has weird benefits
Dude, I'm a 5 lol
Nah... Auto-laser cannon. Way more exciting than laser auto cannon.
That makes some sense but it sounds like a problem for the companies to solve logistically and not just burden on the household buyer as a bandage.