Generally hats are removed to make sure people aren't smuggling things in their hair into the jail.

It's a fuck as in what the fuck is that, and it certainly isn't a dish to look at.

Holding in a very deep breathe for as long as you can can also get rid of hiccups. Works for me at least, and no need to look silly leaned over with a glass of water.

Who doesn't know about Siamese?

And most people I know Have heard of Ragdolls, and Sphinxes at least.

She was snarky well before that happened.

What else are you going to do?

wait the mandatory 5 days

Such a version may not exist if the meme was originally posted to Facebook.

I say all this as someone who enjoys NMS, has about 80 hours in it, and there is absolutely fun stuff to do, and is definitely worth playing. Having said that, it is very shallow for the following reasons:

NMS has very little story. I've played through all the missions, and there is very little dialogue, very few characters, virtually no choices. So overall the story is very shallow, but it's fine.

The random NPCs say very little, and do almost nothing. So quite shallow.

The space stations have very little variety, and very little life to them. Same with settlements and trade centers on different planets.

The randomly generated structures take on maybe a dozen varieties, so they get extremely repetitive after the first few hours.

Combat is very limited and repetitive. There's only a few enemy types, and pretty limited weapon variety. Same with space combat, which pretty much always plays out the same due to limited weapon variety and limited ship controls.

But again, I like NMS, and do recommend it. It's just not a deep experience.

They all do, just add /instances after the url

Woops, thanks for the correction.

Pitbull info is your source? Yeah, that's not going to be biased at all.

The first link is to a paper where the authors only identified the breed in 45b out of 256 dog attacks, and they concluded breed had nothing to do with the attack? Bullshit, they didn't know the breed 80% of the time, so they could not make that conclusion. Plus abusive and neglectful owners only accounted for 20% of dog attacks, so most attacks are not a result of bad owners.

The second link is to a paper out of Ireland that doesn't include any data about pitbulls, the legislated breeds include German shepherds and rottweilers, but no pitbulls. yet the website is using that paper to defend pitbulls? Absolute bullshit, since they aren't in the paper.

Their third link is to their own website, that horribly misuses the data and statistics, and draws false conclusions, so it's complete bullshit.

Must I go on? That website is just a giant crock of shit designed to fool people.

Here's some data for you:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fatal_dog_attacks_in_the_United_States

Actual dog attacks, and the vast majority are pitbulls. It has nothing to do with race, pitbulls are responsible for the vast majority of fatal dog attacks. That's the facts.

The people I know that have been bitten by dogs, all pits. And all owned by white people.

Stop trying to tie this to racism, it isn't a dogwhistle. Pitbulls are the most dangerous type of dog there is.

No, that's pit apologists. The dog breed that accounts for 70% of fatal attacks should be banned, and guess what, that's pits.