TheV2

joined 2 years ago
[–] TheV2@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago

In a desktop browser I could always do that (+ ads-free with ublock).

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 5 points 6 days ago

I wouldn't assume anything with only this information. Jokes about death and suicide aren't uncommon and we don't know how they mean it. However it doesn't hurt to ask them and give them the opportunity to share their pain and sad songs with you.

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Honestly I don't consider them plot holes. 'Don't try to understand it' was not only directed at the protagonist. The premise is pretty much what if we simply accepted this impossible mechanic.

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago

Do you mind if I do not do that?

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What I meant is that some people portray the thin flat object itself as a 2D object, e.g. a piece of paper opposed to a box. I do understand that it's intuitive to associate the absence of a dimension with a value close to 0 for it and vice versa, because that's how we visualize it.

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, they are only abstractions, just like numbers are. I do not understand your conclusion that they therefore do not exist.

I still upvoted this, because I can see where you are coming from. It's frustrating when adults portray thin flat objects as "2D objects" to explain dimensions to children. It's not a simplification; it's simply wrong.

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Probably not.

  1. I can't be certain that these earnings will cover even 10% of my expenses for a lifetime, because you never know.
  2. I feel too young to make such a drastic decision that will tremendously limit my future.
  3. I prefer enjoyable work with a healthy work-life-balance over not working at all.

If anything, I'd take more risks and sacrifices to get a more fulfilling work experience.

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Google's cloud IDE

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

While I'd interpret it this way, too, "can't understand the hype of" usually translates to simply "dislike", but with a stronger emphasis on invalidating the opinions of the people who do like it.

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What exactly happened that leads to your conclusion that none of your support requests are going through? And why was it not possible to continue the on-going support request that you showed in your screenshot?

[–] TheV2@programming.dev -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I disagree. Porn, just like attitude era wrestling and splatter horror games, are precisely targeted at teenagers.

Should they be addicted to porn? No, neither should adults be. Is porn content moderated enough across the internet? No, regardless who watches it.

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Technically I do share it with the world, since I did upload some of my writings to my website. But the website itself was actively shared with only a few people. I'm not satisfied with my writings, but I'm satisfied with writing as a hobby.

I'm a terrible writer, but I love to get my thoughts and feelings out in form of fictional stories. Unintentionally they seem to be pessimistic, suicidal and pretentious, I think, as one friend keeps telling me that they are so deep and full of meaning. Only a few exceptions were good enough to get her to discuss the actual topics.

I write irregularly in recent times. Since I currently work on my first novel(s), I spend more time on outlining.

It used to be my dream to become a writer / screenwriter. Now I wouldn't want that, even if I was good. At best, I would make an anonymous physical copy of my first novel(s), but then again, that seems like a huge waste.

 

Is there a movie where the horror is completely hidden in the details without any revelation? A movie that is only horror to those who repeat-watch it, pay extra close attention or simply give in to their paranoid doubts?

9
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by TheV2@programming.dev to c/fullmoviesonyoutube@lemm.ee
 

Joel gathers his friends at a remote cabin to celebrate the completion of his latest feature film in his 12 features project.

This movie is part of Joel Haver's challenge to create 12 feature films in 12 months. I just watched it now and I think it's the most relatable, yet insane and perhaps one of my favorite movies of all time. So even if I might not feel the same way tomorrow, I have the urge to share it now.

 

After a long time I'm in a situation where I sometimes work on a temporary system without my individual setup. Now whenever I might add a new custom (nushell) command that abstracts the usage of CLI tools, I think about the loss of muscle memory/knowledge for these tools and how much time I waste looking them up without my individual setup. No, that's not a huge amount of time, but just out of curiosity I'd like to know how I can minimize this problem as much as possible.

Do you have some tips and solutions to handle this dilemma? I try to shadow and wrap existing commands, whenever it's possible, but that's often not the case. Abbreviations in fish are optimal for this problem in some cases, but I don't think going back to fish as my main shell for this single reason would be worth it.

 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/23442993

Sometimes I create a solution to a simple problem. However instead of making use of the solution, I keep extending it unnecessarily. This is why for this kind of project, I want to systematically restrain my future self from adding new features beyond the initial vision e.g. by actively refusing generic and re-usable code.

What is the search engine friendly term for this approach or at least for this situation? "Ad-hoc programming" may be literally what I'm talking about, but in practice it's associated with unplanned happenings.

 

Sometimes I create a solution to a simple problem. However instead of making use of the solution, I keep extending it unnecessarily. This is why for this kind of project, I want to systematically restrain my future self from adding new features beyond the initial vision e.g. by actively refusing generic and re-usable code.

What is the search engine friendly term for this approach or at least for this situation? "Ad-hoc programming" may be literally what I'm talking about, but in practice it's associated with unplanned happenings.

 

Is there any kind of fiction where multiple stories are connected in a recursive loop? The connection could be a character who writes or narrates the story. e.g.

  • story A -> story B
  • story B -> story C
  • story C -> story A

Thanks in advance for any help!

view more: next ›