[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

Over the course of 10 minutes. That means she said it about every 3 seconds...

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

And Colorado proposition 131

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago
[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

Seriously. $100,000 watches? Who the fuck is the target audience for this?

Trump fanatics with a lot of money. Which if even one person buys one (And Im sure someone has) The entire charade becomes worth it.

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

the graph is clearly just fitted to the data

That's the problem. It's heavily skewed when compared to the greater overall engagement statistics.

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 weeks ago

Care to elaborate?

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 month ago

Great job bashing the dems while contributing nothing of substance to the conversation. Do you have any points concerning Trump's or Harris' manufacturing policies? Also, per your last point, please tell me how that commenters grievances are illegitimate. Is it because they're trans?

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

He has just as much expertise as trump does, which is basically nothing.

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Ah, yes, the old "consumers are the problem" rhetoric when, in actuality, they only account for 10% of emissions.

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

When did this happen?

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That sir is a swan

E: could also be a goose

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 29 points 4 months ago

As someone who sells both the ecotanks are good, but you dont quite get the yield they promise upfront.

Because the ink has to travel all the way from the reservoir at the front of the printer to the print head, there is much more distance that the ink has to travel, giving it more opportunity to dry out. To combat this, ecotanks need to purge much more frequently than traditional inkjets that mount the cartridges next to the print head. This requires shooting a lot of the ink through the lines at high speed/pressure in turn wasting ink.

Also, once this cleaning cycle has been run enough times, you need to replace the ink pad that absorbs all the ink used to clean out the printer. (Only costs 10 bucks)

All of this said, I still recommend them to folks who need to print photos at home, as their color accuracy is impressive for a CMYK printer, and while the yield isn't as high as they claim, it is still much cheaper per page than most other inkjets. But more often than not, I try to convince people to just get a monochrome Brother and use a printing service/shop that has a multi-thousand dollar photo printer when they need photos.

view more: next ›

ThomasLadder_69

joined 1 year ago