Das Problem ist nicht ein zu hohes Bürgergeld. Das Problem ist ein zu geringer Mindestlohn.
Was it really a British ship, or was it a ship running under Liberian or Lagos or whatever cheap flag, but owned by a British company?
If it ran under the British flag, then it would have been the British marines' job to defend it. OK.
If it ran under the Flag of Panama, Liberia, Lagos, or whatever, it would have been their responsibility.
None of the tax evasion flags countries have a ship there to defend what would be their duty to defend. Instead, we finance and endanger our military to protect tax evaders' ships.
In welcher Hinsicht ist es das neue Amazon? "Irgendwas Online Bestellen"? Das hatte Otto schon. "Ausnutzung von Mitarbeitern"? Das können die anderen auch...
Da gibt es zwei unterschiedliche Probleme: Facharbeiter die fehlen, und Arbeitskräfte die fehlen.
Die ersten fehlen, weil Firmen nicht selber in die Weiterbildung investieren, gleichzeitig aber nicht gewillt sind, vorgebildeten Fachkräften auf dem Markt eine entsprechend attraktive Arbeitsstelle zu bieten.
Die zweiten fehlen, weil Arbeitgeber maximale Flexibilität bei minimaler Entlohnung erwarten - Arbeitnehmer, die wie eine Maschine ohne Seele und Verstand auf Knopfdruck zu- und abgeschaltet werden können, und mit möglichst wenig Geld abgespeist werden, am besten noch als Scheinselbstständige, die für 5€ pro Stunde noch ihr eigenes Auto ruinieren.
Ahh, the good old RFCs dated April, 1st. This one is number 1149 ( A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers), and got later updated in RFC 2549 (IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service).
Just because they don't report shootings under ten kills anymore does not mean they don't happen. But mass shootings, i.e. incidents where four or more people are killed) are still daily occurances in the US.
Excerpt from the US version of the Prayer of the Lord: "... and give us today our daily ~~bread~~ mass shooting ..."
There are a lot of reasons for that. Most of them start with FPTP voting, which ultimately leads to less parties being present in a parliament and less democratic representation ofthe actual will of the people, which in turn leads to radicalisation, which in turn leads to the inability to compromise because this would look "weak" for the more radicalized people in the party.
Another problem is the disparity between population and representation in US politics This is based on the founding fathers' dislike of people living in cities due to their experience with London back in the time. They got it wrong for the wrong reasons, but US politics still considers even the most outdated notions of the founding fathers as gospel and won't fix the most glaring issues that plague US politics.
In No Mans Sky, you've seen five planets, you've seen them all.
They don't care about a "safe web environment". That is not making them any more money. Knowing much more about their users and being able to perfectly match everything a user does anywhere with Googles advertising business, though, will.
Some of those spam fighters did this, emulating an old bumbling man who avoided any "yes" like answers that could be malinterpreted as consent to anything, and kept the caller busy for many minutes with pauses, uncommitted "Hmms", and useless questions. But I doubt that this program is available anywhere.
Treczoks
joined 1 year ago
And the reasoning? As always Terrorists, pedophile, criminals, etc. Guess what: If those guys have not learned yet to make a big detour around official chat apps, they deserve getting caught. My bet is, those people already have their own secured means of communication. Maybe they have their own encrypted app, or they have a forum somewhere in the Darknet, whatever. But the chance that this new law will catch anything worthwhile is practically nil.