Guess he has only been working 250x as hard as the other employees
What paper is that?
If this passes, smartphone manufacturers are going to register their devices as religious artifacts
I feel like the fediverse would be better off without a lot of current X users
All companies seem to be doing their best lately to cure us of our social media addiction.
And people in the comments discussing how Lemmy users should talk less about reddit.
People have been hailing WFH after COVID as a lasting change. But it has always been clear that non fundamentally remote companies will never accept this as a permanent solution.
Hybrid is a really bad in between, the advantages seem marginal (more flexible remote days, less needed office space) to the disadvantages (people will still be mostly remote in meetings, commute times still a factor, work environments need to be duplicated between home and office).
I never knew I needed API fanfiction
If they can talk they can pay rent
Ubuntu is fine and I actually am on Ubuntu after using Arch for many years
Das ist ungefähr so "aus versehen", wie die AfD beim tweeten "mausgerutscht" sei.
Die wollen wahrscheinlich die Wasser testen, jetzt wo AfD im Auftrend ist. Wir sind nicht mehr weit von Österreichischen Verhältnissen entfernt.
I feel like most things degrade as a matter of scope-creep, while trying to implement features that are actually complex and non-trivial.
Take the unholy mess of modern Microsoft Office. MS Office might have been a good tool for a single purpose back in the 80s, but the addition of multiple generation/layers of features that have been halfway abandoned but kept for compatibilitys sake, make any more complex task non-trivial. There are multiple approaches for implementing templating MS Word, none of which are really good. MS Macros have been great... if you are trying to get arbitrary code execution on Windows machines. And collaboretive editing features include halfway abandoned sharing features and a half-baked Web Version of Office 365.
As a matter of fact I don't believe this is purely out of corporate greed, but rather a lack of scope limitation during design. People don't ask if they should, if they simply can do. We shouldn't have macros inside of Text Documents, there should be another tool for that. We shouldn't have SQL queries pulling into Excel Worksheets. We shouldn't use Excel as a database, but people had to change names of biological genes to avoid these being autoformatted in Excel.
But as a matter of fact, in general one is limited to working with the tools one knows, so convincing someone to use the correct tool for a job will always be harder than just delivering additional features, that we know will make the overall product worse.