[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

How about “There will always be someone exploiting the system/people”

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

If you aren’t human, perhaps

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Why would you want that? It seems a bit arbitrary for me to make sense.

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago

Du meinst, so wie man deinen Kommentar ernst nehmen soll? Deine Lösung ist lächerlich und das weißt du selber schon ganz genau. Mal ganz davon abgesehen schießt du hier gegen den Falschen, denn ich kritisiere das Handeln der Lokführer nicht. Genau so wie es ist, haben die Lokführer eine gewisse Machtstellung. Mehr Lokführer die kuschen und fahren, wenn die Mehrheit streikt, ist eher schlecht für bessere Bedingungen...

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, exactly. Thanks!

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, If it wasn't clear to you. I thought it was obvious, so I didn't think much about it. I meant that those people, who pick on you for having sensory issues, are assholes. I also have problems with sensory input and if someone were to make fun of me for having these problems, I'd be absolutely livid about it.

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, hopefully. Because walking around in a foreign country without any kind of navigation is a pure joy.

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, couldn't help myself 😂 Nice setup though. I wish I had the time and energy to setup my system like that again.

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Looks really nice! What bugs me is that Cache::find creates a directory. 😅

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

I have no idea what you're speaking about and I'm not particularly inclined to look after these examples. The first thing you did was to insult me. Do you expect somebody to talk to you after that, in any meaningful way anyway?

We live in a patriarchy, women are grossly underrepresented and sexism is still the norm. So, yes, I give women the benefit of the doubt, because the history of women being abused is nothing new and the amount of that happening even today is not tolerable.

What I never wrote was that you have to believe everything at face value and to take out the pitch fork to manslaughter the oppressors.
Of course both sides should be heard. That is the whole point. Then problem is that victims are at a disadvantage, so it is important to take them seriously and to hear them.

People denying, downplaying or discouraging is what the problem is. People in power abusing people with no power is what the problem is.

But yeah, tell me that I'm the problem. Go on and call me an Idiot. I don't care. You could've written that what I wrote was wrong and why. We could have had a meaningful discussion. You chose not to.

You say that both sides should be heard but are not doing so yourself.

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I intend to believe people who speak out about their experiences. Victims had it hard enough and should be heard and trusted. People with similar experiences or supporting the claims almost always follow anyway.

[-] avonarret1@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Is it just me or does he look like he is holding up some mannequin hands? Sorry, OP, it's just confusing as hell 😂

More OT: I think most of us know beforehand and have to wade through a sea of shit to get a confirmation and medication. Annoying as duck, but then again it is the jobs of professionals to make sure, so I wasn't not too mad about that.

I wonder if anyone will ever read this. 🤔

view more: ‹ prev next ›

avonarret1

joined 1 year ago