douglasg14b

Only if you don't have the critical thinking to understand how information management is a significant problem and barrier to medical care.

Being able to research and find material relevant to a patient's problem is an arduous task that often is too high a barrier for doctors to invest in given their regular workloads.

Which leads to a reduction in effective care.

By providing a more efficient and effective way to dig up information that saves a ton of time and improves care.

It's still up to the doctor to evaluate that information, but now they're not slogging away trying to find it.

It's already in use responsibly.

And irresponsibly.

Turns out that you can't really argue the slope of responsibility as a way to shoot down a tool, when that's an individual choice of how someone uses that tool.

I love seeing these outside views from folks who aren't developers 🤣

Gen AI is pretty well integrated into development pipelines at this point. In ways that are subtle and quite useful.

Especially autocomplete as you write code, and boiler plate autofill. These used genai, are subtle and not necessarily intrusive, and are pretty widely integrated across the development ecosystem.

Like everything the poison makes the dose. The larger the dose of genai the more poison you are introducing into your work.

Your arguing with someone who's head is far too deep in their own ass to actually understand what you're saying.

It's frustrating, very frustrating, that this is the lowest common denominator on the Internet today. And it's only getting worse as kids grow up under the thumb of their corporate spoon fed news feeds.

Imagine trying to understand different perspectives.

Critical thinking really is dead if this is the kind of attitude you think is acceptable.

I mean, rule of law doesn't matter anymore anyways.

So... The states could just ... Ignore it? Just like the fed has been.

We don't need people that push a divisive narrative and push us away from each other.

This is the kind of shit astroturfing bots do, and it works, it's toxic AF.

GTFO out of here with this kind of toxic gatekeeping bullshit please.

Back to reddit with you!

Don't forget actual laws passing in poorly educated state legislatures banning "chem trails" 🤦

Moving/copying/reading/deleting tonnes of tiny files isn’t significantly faster on an ssd because the requirements for doing so are not limited by HDDs in the first place.

You mean the physical actuator moving a read/write head over a spinning platter? Which limits its traversal speed over its physical media? Which severely hampers its ability to read data from random locations?

You mean that kind of limitation? The kind of limitation that is A core part of how a hard drive works?

That?

I would highly recommend that you learn what a hard drive is before you start commenting about its its performance characteristics. 🤦🤦🤦

For everyone else in the thread, remember that arguing with an idiot is always a losing battle because they will drag you down to their level and win with experience.

This is like asking for a source for common sense statements.

HDDs are pretty terrible at random IO, which is what reading many small files tends to be. This is because they have a literal mechanical arm with a tiny magnet on the end that needs to move around to read sectors on a spinning platter. The physical limitations of how quickly the read right head can traverse limits it's random I/O capabilities.

This makes hard drives, abysmal, at random I/O. And why defragmenting is a thing.

This is common knowledge for anyone in it and easy knowledge to obtain by reading a Wikipedia page.

SSDs are great at random I/O. They do not have physical components that need to move in order to read from random locations they generally perform equally as well from reading any location. Meaning their random I/O capabilities are significantly better.

No, I shouldn't know, IDFC.

Let's have some actually useful YSK and not celebrity birthdays.