Spending money while not doing Anything any research group has ever recommended is the same as doing nothing. They've spent a billion on 1930s era "solutions" that make conservative liberals feel like theyve accomplished things while doing literally not one thing to actually solve the causes of homelessness. If they spent a million on new city owned no rent housing, that would be more than the entirety of all their other projects combined.
escapesamsara
joined 8 months ago
Soldiers, Get ready to die for another group of rich fascists starting wars for profit.
Read more than the first line, try again, and maybe enroll in a literacy program instead of continuing to exist online.
So you agree the iron dome instàllations in and around civilian buildings were put there by terrorists right?
https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803103209420
Terrrorism is the use of violence to cause political change. Not whatever nonsense you were taught in whatever terrible education system produced you.
Point it towards Earth, or if that's impossible with future space magic, towards the largest gravity well, i.e. center of the local galaxy or nearest dense object.
So the same definition of terrorism, i.e. specific actions done to further political goals. You're mad for no reason here
Incredibly incorrect. SF has done less than nothing to solve the problem for 20 years, and is shocked when doing nothing did nothing.
Because, quite frankly, there is no place for inefficient vehicles, and without ecus/other electronic controls ICE vehicles are basically unable to compete
Wikipedia has brief introductions to both concepts for you since it's the first time you've heard about america's involvement in the middle east.
It's used exclusively as an offensive system, so yes. Israel wouldn't start so many wars I'd they didn't have a free to operate shield blocking most retaliation attempts.