git LFS might be for you. If the data takes so long to reprocess I think it is fine to check it in (possibly using LFS).

Finde ehrlich gesagt nicht, dass man den Autoren hier unterstellen kann, dass sie es so framen als wäre er nur 1km/h zu schnell gefahren. Im Text taucht die Aussage ja eigentlich nur als Zitat vom Fahrer auf und wird dann auch als uneinsichtig eingeordnet. Der Titel ist halt einfach Clickbait.

This is the correct way. I wish hetzner had a storage box size between the 1TB and 5TB version though.

I think this somewhat depends on how tech savvy the people you want to give editing access are. If they know how to handle git and write markdown, I'd go with a git repository with (for example) mkdocs and setup CI/CD to automatically deploy to Github Pages. This would be free. If they are more like the typical MS Word andy, I'd go with a self hosted instance of bookstack. You could host it for example on fly. Unfortunately bookstack does not (yet) support sqlite so you'll also need mariadb, which will make hosting it on fly slightly more expensive (but probably still far below $10), because you'll need 2 machines in total. One of which you can't scale to zero. There are probably other cloud providers where its going to be cheaper though.

My setup is simple:

• Pictures: I don't take many and rarely look at them tbh. So they just sit on my laptops NVMe
• Music: I only ever use cmus for listening to music => Therefore music is also only locally on my laptop, managed with beets
• Movies/Tv Shows: I have jellyfin running on a raspberry Pi 4. For single user use this works fine (even transcoding DVD quality works). For multi user or higher resolution transcoding this probably won't work.
• Backups: One off-site backup at a cloud storage provider using restic and one backup on a USB hdd I simply plug in every other week.

My recommendation is: Keep it as simple as possible. In the past I created the craziest setups, but it turns out that in every day life I have neither the time nor motivation to maintain that shit.

Well, yeah it sometimes does happen even if I'm not googling, but it's nowhere near as exhausting. But I feel like forcing myself to stick to methodically approaches still great advice.

Well, of course you are right. The problem is that for many people (including me) it is hard to use it in a way that actually brings value, because it is just too easy to spend hours on there without getting anything in return.

I also think that it is highly subjective what can be considered "good" or "bad" content. When it comes to educational content, I also would consider it a waste of time. Sure, if I have a real life problem and the solution happens to be described in a youtube video, there is nothing wrong with watching it. But often times I was just like "Oh, this could be useful at some point in the future" and at the end of the video I could hardly remember what it was about. I also don't think that "mindless" content is inherently bad. If it helps someone to relax, go for it. I always felt worse afterwards.

Saying youtube would be a big waste of time in general is indeed reductive, but I think for many people it actually is, because it is just not designed to be used to bring you value. The only objective is that you spend as many hours on their platform as possible.