[-] fox@hexbear.net 29 points 10 months ago

Being allowed to die when you choose is fine and good but good goddamn it should not exist in a neoliberal system that'll end up socially murdering all the non-productives and the neurodivergent.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 52 points 11 months ago

Hbomberguy, after doing a video that deleted Tommy Tallarico by exposing a career of lies (even getting one of his world records removed in the process of research alone), put out a video discussing plagiarism where he, with receipts, showed Internet Historian, Illuminaughtii, and James Somerton conducted significant plagiarism. All 3 fan bases went feral over it. Somerton deleted his socials and lost a shitload of his patreon money and IH's fans are having a Normal One.

Somerton was the main focus of the video. He's a gay man who created a series of video essays that are basically all entirely plagiarized word for word from dozens of other queer creators, pretty much straight up stealing money from them. Hbomb has dedicated all the revenue he makes from this video to be split between everyone somerton stole from, which hilariously includes Wikipedia.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago

For sure they know, it's just cops are lazy and aren't paid to solve crimes

[-] fox@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago

Arms manufacturers want more $ and can't get more $ if the stockpiles are full

[-] fox@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

Most countries that aren't America aren't inundated with anti-China rhetoric, so if someone starts spouting off about China (and especially Chinese civil rights, or uses the term "CCP") in English they're almost certainly an American.

Does China lag behind the west in terms of queer rights? Yes. We're critical of that but also recognize the grassroots initiatives within the CPC to change that, and support those efforts. Does China pollute more in raw numbers than America? Yeah, but they're also the global leader in green power production, so they're clearly working to fix the emissions problem, which we support. China also takes a non-imperialist stance internationally, which is far and away better than anything America has ever done internationally.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Someone else has a server and their infrastructure is set up so you can upload a zip of some executable and they'll figure out how to make it run. You don't worry about any details except your code and whatever API is require to be compatible, and they worry about hosting it, making sure it has memory, CPU time, disk space, DB, etc.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

The difference is between private property and personal property. Private property is the means of production that produce wealth by extracting a profit margin from the labor of the workers that operate that means. Seizing private property is just democratizing the ownership of it between all the workers that use it, because you can't really steal a corporation or a factory, just change ownership. Seizing personal property is taking someone's toothbrush or car or books.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

Yes, if you can control more wealth than a mid size city earns in ten lifetimes, you should not be allowed to do that

[-] fox@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

Half the user-facing internet broke for a few hours when one guy withdrew a shitty one-liner piece of JavaScript (the whole leftpad thing) because someone somewhere added it as a dependency to a dependency to a dependency until it was pulled into an enormous frontend library. The internet relies more on random open source contributions than a lot of people are aware of.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

It's mostly to sell to the Japanese market iirc. Not many in Iceland actually have a taste for whale. Huge waste of time and resources.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

During WW2, the Allies wanted to armor their planes better so more would survive missions. But armor is expensive and heavy so you'd have to prioritize where to put it.

So they go out and collect data on the returning planes to see where they'd been hit. That picture is basically the data collected: where returning planes had sustained the most damage.

So most of the engineers looked at that and went "Aha, the points with the most damage should be armored, since they get shredded up pretty good."

And one engineer went "Um actually, if they got shot there and came back, armor doesn't matter. We need to armor the spots with no bullet holes, since a plane shot there wasn't able to return."

And so it was, and they called it Survivor Bias.

In this case, it's survivor bias about becoming more conservative as you age

[-] fox@hexbear.net 101 points 1 year ago

A damning condemnation of your education system, to be certain

view more: next ›

fox

joined 3 years ago