[-] girl@lemm.ee 34 points 9 months ago

idk, but maybe cause your comment implies that this post has a political agenda instead of just being shared because it’s a legitimately mildly infuriating issue

[-] girl@lemm.ee 29 points 9 months ago
[-] girl@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

how tf did this receive funding lmao

[-] girl@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

pronouns, gays, and women are scawy :( oh no whatever will the fragile men do now that they aren’t the only face of video games 🥺🥺🥺

[-] girl@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m glad you feel that way. I have a lot of family down south who 100% think we’re all evil and that our explicit goal is to destroy America. Even in this thread there is someone saying liberals want to murder babies.

[-] girl@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If they’re a good cop, sure, in that one regard. Not many good cops these days, the system actively punishes and removes good cops.

[-] girl@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Yay! I was really upset that the only sport I enjoy watching had chosen to go backwards to such a bullshit hateful policy, very happy to hear they reversed the decision. Good on Travis Dermott for protesting this, way too many players didn’t give a shit!

[-] girl@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

I had strict parents growing up, they probably want the computer in a visible location so they can make sure OP isn’t watching porn or something

[-] girl@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

we just get a bit more handsy than usual and make sexy eyes at each other, it works well

[-] girl@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

It’s certainly patriarchy-hating. If men find that personally offensive and “man-hating”, they should check themselves

[-] girl@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

“According to the group, the proposal gives performers their usual fixed residuals for streaming projects “also a new residual which ‘shares’ in revenue that is somehow attributed to the show.” The group added, “the Union proposes to ‘share’ in success, but not in failure. That is not sharing.” (Of course, before streaming entertainment arrived, actors did share in success but did not in failure — if a project was a hit and re-used or re-run, those performers were compensated with residuals beyond their upfront payments, but were not penalized if the project did poorly.”

This is the biggest sticking point apparently. The union seems to be asking for the same protection actors have historically had against failures. I don’t see a good reason in this article why they should be forced to share in failure when that has never been the case. The studio is, shockingly, just being greedy.

[-] girl@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

Donkey (from Shrek) on C7

I have a plan 😎

view more: ‹ prev next ›

girl

joined 1 year ago