The big Q: Is this to the detriment or benefit of the russian war machine?
If the end result is a more self-sufficient russia and profits going to the war effort ... would it have been the right move? Is the symbolism worth it?
It sounds like it was a very orderly process to ensure the ongoing viability of the business.
I'd rather see russian factories dismantled, thousands of jobs lost in russia, and significant supply chain issues. I guess that option never factored into the discussion as it would cost investors more.
Is there some pop culture reference that I'm unaware of, or why are you talking nonsense?