kieron115

Were I unwed I would take her in a manly fashion.

What else was he supposed to do at the abbey when he wasn't busy hunting rats? Especially since he never married.

A hateful, young alt-reich kid was taken out by another hateful, young alt-reich kid because one of them didn't think the other was hateful enough. So the entire MAGA cult is in overdrive trying to convince the world that charlie was killed by "the left". You're only hearing about it because its a completely insane political spin.

If this had been an actual shitpost, you would have been instructed where to stick your antenna (up yer bumhole) to recieve more dank memes.

The whois says registered to GoDaddy, but most of it seems to be hosted on something called wsimg.com which is under the registrar wild west domains. I would say everyone should report the site for illegal content but with a name like Wild West Domains I'm not sure they would care. Here it is anyway. https://supportcenter.secureserver.net/AbuseReport. You could also report to GoDaddy and to Domains by Proxy, LLC (owned by go daddy but a separate entity). Name and shame these fuckers as much as possible. Seems like the domains by proxy has been used for political hate speech before too.

Thanks for adding in some more clarity. I worked as a cyber security analyst for the DoD for quite a while (IAT II level stuff) so I know it can get a little esoteric if you aren't in that world. But absolutely, they may have found an index/pointers but the data itself was already overwritten. Or hell they could have found a thumbnail image stored in a cache somewhere that was clear enough. I was just trying to help people understand how something could be both "destroyed" and recovered at the same time. Language can depend on perspective sometimes, and none of us can really know the answer just based on verbage in a report. Could be the person talking to the press didn't have a clear understanding. Either way it will be interesting to see what, if anything, comes of it.

Side note: since you brought up shredding, I thought I'd share the ridiculous process I had to go through when I was active duty. We had to use a crosscut shredder, dump it into a bucket of water to turn it into a slurry, let the slurry dry and then burn the remains lmao.

Maybe I should have left that out, that's just me analyzing it too much. But lets say you shred a document. You would probably say that you've destroyed that document. If someone then took the pieces from the trash and painstakingly put them back together into a readable document, did you still destroy it? Or did you attempt to destroy it?

My guess would be that it was a note on some form of digital media. Say you make a document on your computer that you later delete. The data doesn't actually get deleted, your computer just removes the location from it's giant table of contents and marks the space "available to write". Typically that information can still be retrieved using software tools until it is actually overwritten, and even then there are exceptions. So yes, it is entirely plausible for them to have forensic evidence of a note that someone attempted to destroy.

They had these at the Harris Teeter when I used to live near D.C. The wheels would also lock if you went outside the perimeter they had marked out.