They should probably also change their name to something that denotes their desire to create a fascist theocracy.
It's trying to say that low income housing is the solution to homelessness.
It's wrong, but that's the point it's trying to make.
It's also forgetting that a significant portion of homeless people are homeless by choice, or are homeless for reasons that just providing housing won't resolve.
People have this idea that all homeless people are just regular people who experienced hard times, but that's just a minority. Most homeless are mentally ill people who won't take their meds or drug addicts who aren't willing to quit.
It sucks, and they shouldn't have to live on the streets, but you can't force people to change.
The reason those games are so popular is that they're inherently exploitative. I have no issues with predatory app developers being priced out of business.
Yeah, you might as well not vote. You're never going to sway enough people to vote independent to challenge one of the big two, especially since the choice right now is between old people or people trying to establish a fascist theocracy.
People actually read the article?
[I'm the dumbass who didn't read the article]
She's a tattoo artist. And she isn't when it comes to work.
For my wife I think it's because she puts so much effort into her job that it makes the people who were just coasting look bad, or makes them have to do more work. Those people are usually her bosses.
Yes, but a neural network is just a collection of ML algorithms.
My best friend as a child lived like 4 houses down the cul de sac from us, and I was literally at his house every day.
But still, every day I'd knock and ask if he could play, despite his parents telling me over and over that I could just come inside whenever I wanted.