Although I agree with you to some level, I don't think it's totally fair to say they don't have skin in the game. These people could have easily stayed silent for that potential job offer, an extra connection, or some potential to make more money.
Unless, they have somehow more to gain from endorsing Harris. But idk. Looks sincere to me.
The name calling, yes I agree. But the fact that he pretended to forget like "what's his face I don't care to remember the name of" landed better than Trump's random name calling.
I mean he calls him "Donald dump", it's unlikely he forgot it by a letter.
OP is from the future, when GPUs are a subscription service that processes your graphics online.
TL;DR over from Puget reddit accounts is that their overall failure rates for all chips is very low because they run it at tightly controlled base specs.
So any automatic boosting/OC doesn't come in play here, which might be why Intel chips are failing more in the broader user space.
My guy, the world is 3 dimensions, just because we see the bullet in that pic doesn't mean we know how close they were flying.
Don't get me wrong, the bullets were close, but it's way more likely to get hit from shrapnel than being graded by a bullet just enough to bleed.
Actually, I think it's not about defect numbers. This is about delaying until Intel releases the microcode update. They want to be compared after the (potentially) performance tanking update from Intel. Which is hilarious because Intel gave a date after AMD's initial launch date.
I think it's also fair as a lot of reviewers aren't going to bother retesting after Intel releases updates and comparing with AMD after the 9000 series hype has died down, if they had just recently did so for the AMD launch.
I understand the cynicism. But if you've been following this topic, Intel really fucked with some huge customers (businesses) here. And AMD was already stealing their lunch with their previous gen processors.
In 2024 life is hard and you can't do anything about it in most cases. Religion gives you an excuse for why it must be so, so that you can keep grinding away.
Sorry about that. I shouldn't have had Taco Bell before getting in.
This actually does keep prices in check. Albeit, a bit backasswardsly.
I may be off on the specifics but it's something like: Having to offer 100mbps at the lowest rates in (poor neighborhoods) increases the speeds of each tier while keeping the price the same.
Thank you kind lemming